2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between AT C573T polymorphism and cardiovascular risk factors in myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Canavy et al 21 reported the prevalence of the C allele carriers being higher in patients with MI than in control individuals. However, some other studies reported that AT1R A1166C gene polymorphism was not associated with the MI risk 19,[22][23][24][25]27 AT1R A1166C gene polymorphism might be not associated with MI susceptibility in Caucasians. However, more studies in Caucasians should be performed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Canavy et al 21 reported the prevalence of the C allele carriers being higher in patients with MI than in control individuals. However, some other studies reported that AT1R A1166C gene polymorphism was not associated with the MI risk 19,[22][23][24][25]27 AT1R A1166C gene polymorphism might be not associated with MI susceptibility in Caucasians. However, more studies in Caucasians should be performed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, we also performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association of AT1R A1166C gene polymorphism with acute MI/old MI susceptibility. Ten repo rts 19,23,24,26,29,30,[32][33][34][35] were included for acute MI, and two reports 25,27 The frequency of the C allele in some studies 29,31,32,35 was very low compared to that in other included studies, and those studies were excluded from our further metaanalysis. The frequency of C allele in the case group of the study from Mehri et al 34 was much higher than that in the control group (41.1% vs 29.33%), and this study was also excluded from our further meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three articles were excluded due to duplication of data [2,5,12]. Sixteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for further data analysis [3,4,6–11,13–20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%