2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between delivery mode and pelvic organ prolapse: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, it is significantly associated with developing primary POP, but in the other study, it is significantly protective against developing POP. Comparable inconsistencies were found in the meta-analysis by Leng et al 48 even though they analyzed vacuum and forceps delivery in a combined factor. The systematic review by Cattani et al 5 stated that forceps delivery is a risk factor for primary POP, but in contrast to our present review, they included studies that did not make a clear distinction between women with primary POP and women who already had a history of POP surgery.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 89%
“…In one study, it is significantly associated with developing primary POP, but in the other study, it is significantly protective against developing POP. Comparable inconsistencies were found in the meta-analysis by Leng et al 48 even though they analyzed vacuum and forceps delivery in a combined factor. The systematic review by Cattani et al 5 stated that forceps delivery is a risk factor for primary POP, but in contrast to our present review, they included studies that did not make a clear distinction between women with primary POP and women who already had a history of POP surgery.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 89%
“…A similar finding was reported by a Czech study [30] used the PFDI-20 for primiparous 5-10 years after delivery. However, a recent meta-analysis [31] analyzed subjective reports for POP, and a recent Chinese study [16], used the PFDI-20, reported a higher risk for POP among patients who delivered vaginally. The ICS committee found a mode of delivery as a debatable risk factor for POP, and argue that the pelvic floor damage may be the result of previous pregnancies rather than previous deliveries [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Ergebnisse aus 3 Metaanalysen zeigen hier eine signifikante Reduktion eines späteren Auftretens eines Genitalprolapses in der Gruppe der Kaiserschnittentbindungen [12].…”
Section: Fa Zit Für Die Pr a Xisunclassified