2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between depressive symptoms in the postpartum period and COVID-19: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings from this study are consistent with a growing body of evidence which shows that Covid-19 had a negative impact on perinatal mental health. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported pooled prevalence estimates between 17% (95% CI: 10–24%) and 34% (95% CI: 21–46%) for postnatal depression during the pandemic, 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 and our prevalence estimate in the 2020 survey is in line with these figures. The majority of reviews conducted during the pandemic indicate significantly higher prevalence of postnatal depression compared to pre-pandemic rates of 17–18% 17 , 18 which is also consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings from this study are consistent with a growing body of evidence which shows that Covid-19 had a negative impact on perinatal mental health. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported pooled prevalence estimates between 17% (95% CI: 10–24%) and 34% (95% CI: 21–46%) for postnatal depression during the pandemic, 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 and our prevalence estimate in the 2020 survey is in line with these figures. The majority of reviews conducted during the pandemic indicate significantly higher prevalence of postnatal depression compared to pre-pandemic rates of 17–18% 17 , 18 which is also consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported prevalence of postnatal depression during the pandemic, with pooled estimates ranging from 17% to 34%. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 Most of these reviews have indicated higher rates of postnatal depression during the pandemic, 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 compared to pre-pandemic rates (global pooled prevalence 17–18%), 17 , 18 although not all have reported statistically significant differences. 15 , 16 The studies included in reviews conducted before and during the pandemic are highly variable in terms of target population, sampling methods, and mental health measures, and this heterogeneity makes it difficult to pool and compare prevalence estimates reliably, and therefore to evaluate the impact of Covid-19 on postnatal depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study found an increase of PPDS during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Asia ( I 2 = 0%), while studies conducted in Europe and North America showed no significant increase of PPDS prevalence ( Figure 7 ). One recent meta-analysis that found an increased PPDS prevalence during the COVID-19 over the world with high heterogeneity ( I 2 = 95%) ( 21 ). No further subgroups analysis were conducted in this meta-analysis ( 21 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recent meta-analysis that found an increased PPDS prevalence during the COVID-19 over the world with high heterogeneity ( I 2 = 95%) ( 21 ). No further subgroups analysis were conducted in this meta-analysis ( 21 ). Furthermore, the high heterogeneity between studies that may negatively affect the accuracy of the result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation