Association between doctor-patient familiarity and patient-centred care during general practitioner's consultations: a direct observational study in Chinese primary care practice

Abstract

Background Patient-centred care is a core attribute of primary care. Not much is known about the relationship between patient-centred care and doctor-patient familiarity. This study aimed to explore the association between general practitioner (GP) perceived doctor-patient familiarity and the provision of patient-centred care during GP consultations. Methods This is a direct observational study conducted in eight community health centres in China. Level of familiarity was rated by GPs using a dichotomized variable (Yes/No). The provision of patient-centred care during GP consultations was measured by coding audiotapes using a modified Davis Observation Code (DOC) interactional instrument. Eight individual codes in the modified DOC were selected for measuring the provision of patient-centred care, including ‘family information’, ‘treatment effects’, ‘nutrition guidance’, ‘exercise guidance’, ‘health knowledge’, ‘patient question’, ‘chatting’, and ‘counseling’. Multivariate analyses of covariance were adopted to evaluate the association between GP perceived doctor-patient familiarity and patient-centred care. Results A total of 445 audiotaped consultations were collected, with 243 in the familiar group and 202 in the unfamiliar group. No significant difference was detected in overall patient-centred care between the two groups. For components of patient-centred care, the number of intervals (1.36 vs 0.88, p = 0.026) and time length (7.26 vs. 4.40 s, p = 0.030) that GPs spent in ‘health knowledge’, as well as time length (13.0 vs. 8.34 s, p = 0.019) spent in ‘patient question’ were significantly higher in unfamiliar group. The percentage of ‘chatting’ (11.9% vs. 7.34%, p = 0.012) was significantly higher in the familiar group. Conclusions This study suggested that GP perceived doctor-patient familiarity may not be associated with GPs’ provision of patient-centred care during consultations in the context of China. Not unexpectedly, patients would show more health knowledge and ask more questions when GPs were not familiar with them. Further research is needed to confirm and expand on these findings.

The relationship between psychological capital, patient’s contempt, and professional identity among general practitioners during COVID-19 in Chongqing, China

“…Doctors may spend more time establishing medical history and treatment, paying less attention to the situation other than the disease. Thus, the patient’s experience of seeing a doctor is ignored, which leads to a decrease in the patient’s recognition of the doctor, thus affecting the doctor–patient relationship [ 47 , 48 ]. By contrast, although China’s medical technology is comparable with that of the rest of the world, owing to the relatively late development of general practice, the basic medical insurance system continues to be a “disease-centered” structural framework, despite the introduction of medical reforms 10 years ago; therefore, it remains difficult to achieve “bio-psycho-social” patient-centered medicine.…”

Process quality of type 2 diabetes mellitus care and association with patient perceived attributes of family doctor service in urban general practices, Beijing, China

“…GPs providing continuous care for a given patient have a greater understanding of the patient’s health issues than multiple providers do and can provide better care [ 39 ]. Besides, continuous care helps to increase the familiarity of GPs and patients, which may in turn encourages GPs to provide more health counseling to the patient [ 40 ]. The addition of nurse and preventive care physician might be able to make up for the large workload of GPs.…”