2019
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1651938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between EGFR expression and clinical outcome of laryngeal HPV squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between both biomarkers in lung cancer has been less reported. Nevertheless, inconsistent findings in head and neck cancers have been obtained regarding the correlation, with a strong association found between HPV infections and EGFR expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma [ 31 ], and a strong correlation with phosphorylated EGFR expression in HPV-negative tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma [ 32 ]. The prognostic value of HPV infection and EGFR expression in head and neck cancers has been reported as HPV infections on the survival outcomes are identified as a better prognostic factor [ 33 , 34 ], and phosphorylated EGFR is associated with longer survival and as a potential therapeutic biomarker [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between both biomarkers in lung cancer has been less reported. Nevertheless, inconsistent findings in head and neck cancers have been obtained regarding the correlation, with a strong association found between HPV infections and EGFR expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma [ 31 ], and a strong correlation with phosphorylated EGFR expression in HPV-negative tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma [ 32 ]. The prognostic value of HPV infection and EGFR expression in head and neck cancers has been reported as HPV infections on the survival outcomes are identified as a better prognostic factor [ 33 , 34 ], and phosphorylated EGFR is associated with longer survival and as a potential therapeutic biomarker [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, it has been reported that the expression of EGFR can be negatively regulated by the methylation of its promoter, which is more often associated with HPV infection ( 24 ). In this regard, it is of note that HPV-positive HNSCCs have a tendency to express lower levels of EGFR as compared to HPV-negative tumors ( 29 , 52 , 69 , 70 ). On the other hand, as regards the impact of HPV status on the expression levels of ErbB receptors, HPV-positive HNSCC have been found to express higher levels of ErbB2, ErbB3 and ErbB2:ErbB3 heterodimers as compared to HPV-negative tumors ( 70 ).…”
Section: Aberrant Expression Of Erbb Receptors In Hnsccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though HPV-positive HNSCCs have a tendency to express lower levels of EGFR, according to some authors this receptor holds prognostic value also in this subgroup of tumors. In fact, it has been reported that the outcome of HPV-positive tumors with higher EGFR levels is worse as compared to that of HPV-positive tumors with low EGFR ( 29 , 52 , 69 ). However, others reported that the impact of EGFR on outcome may be limited to HPV-negative HNSCCs ( 32 , 79 ).…”
Section: Erbb Receptors and Prognosis Of Hnsccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mEGFR protein expression was assessed according to the following scoring approach: 0 (no immunoreactivity or immunoreactivity in <10% of cells), 1+ (faint weak and incomplete staining in > 10% of cells), 2+ (weak to moderate complete membrane immunoreactivity in > 10% of cells), and 3+ (strong complete membrane immunoreactivity in > 10% of cells). 18 nEGFR protein expression was evaluated and ranked into 4 groups according to the percentage of the positive cells: strong (3+, > 35%), moderate (2+, 18% to 35%), weak (1+, 1% to 17%), and negative (−, 0%). 6 For subsequent clinicopathologic associations and survival statistical analyses nEGFR and mEGFR were graded as weak expression if staining was 0/1+/2++ and strong if staining was 3+.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%