2023
DOI: 10.1080/1059924x.2023.2176958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Ergonomic Burden Assessed Using 20-Item Agricultural Work-Related Ergonomic Risk Questionnaire and Shoulder, Low Back, and Leg Pain in Korean Farmers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study [13], a survey was administered to 1,001 Korean farmers using the Korean version of the 20-item Agricultural Work-related Ergonomic Risk Questionnaire. This questionnaire aimed to evaluate the frequencies of 20 actions associated with ergonomic risks in agricultural work.…”
Section: Items Of Physical Work Capacity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous study [13], a survey was administered to 1,001 Korean farmers using the Korean version of the 20-item Agricultural Work-related Ergonomic Risk Questionnaire. This questionnaire aimed to evaluate the frequencies of 20 actions associated with ergonomic risks in agricultural work.…”
Section: Items Of Physical Work Capacity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to selectively evaluate functional capacity evaluations related to agriculture. Understanding the specific burden in Korean agriculture such as squatting, repetitive wrist movements, shoulder flexion, trunk flexion or twisting, lifting, pushing, and pulling [13], can help determine an individual's suitability for agricultural works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also recruited 339 new eligible individuals engaged in farming between 2016 and 2018. In consideration of the physically demanding nature and varied ergonomic tasks involved in farming [24,25] that contribute to specific changes in muscle volume, individuals who were not engaged in farming were excluded from the study. Among the initially identified 785 eligible participants, we excluded 195 non-active farmers, resulting in a total of 590 farmers who ultimately participated in the current assessment from 2016 to 2018.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%