2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and metabolic syndrome and related outcomes among older residents living near a Science Park in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other epidemiological studies, inconsistent findings exist regarding the association between PFAS and MetS. Overall, no association was observed between PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and MetS in different cross-sectional studies, which is concordant with our analysis [15][16][17][18]21,30,36]. Only two studies one on a small scale (n = 148) of Chinese adult men (19-60 years old) and the other of 1501 adults from a cross-sectional study, the "Isomers of C8 Health Project in China" found a significant association between linear PFOA and the risk of MetS with ORs of 29.4 (95% CI, 2.90-299.7), after adjustment only for age [19] and 1.99 (95% CI, 1.40, 2.83) after adjustment for age, sex, income status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, seafood consumption, and eGFR [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In other epidemiological studies, inconsistent findings exist regarding the association between PFAS and MetS. Overall, no association was observed between PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and MetS in different cross-sectional studies, which is concordant with our analysis [15][16][17][18]21,30,36]. Only two studies one on a small scale (n = 148) of Chinese adult men (19-60 years old) and the other of 1501 adults from a cross-sectional study, the "Isomers of C8 Health Project in China" found a significant association between linear PFOA and the risk of MetS with ORs of 29.4 (95% CI, 2.90-299.7), after adjustment only for age [19] and 1.99 (95% CI, 1.40, 2.83) after adjustment for age, sex, income status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, seafood consumption, and eGFR [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In general, the observed pattern of PFAS levels, relating among participants defined by MetS criteria, were comparable with the results of the four cross-sectional studies. Overall, no association was observed between PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and MetS in different cross-sectional studies, which is concordant with our analysis [17][18][19][20]. For PFNA, the level in this study was relatively lower than the other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 76 Exposure to chemicals in the environment positively correlates with the increase in the development of metabolic diseases. 77–79 Among the chemical substances present in the environment, phytates, 80 organophosphate esters, 81 perfluoroalkyl substances 82 or phenols and parabens, inter alia, increase the likelihood of MetS occurrence. 83 Heavy metals may also play an essential role in the development of not only cardiovascular complications 84 but also MetS, which due to the development of industry, traffic, smoking or changes in food production technology, constitute an imperative element of environmental pollution, also among residents of rural areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%