2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-022-01351-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between forecasting models’ precision and nonlinear patterns of daily river flow time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forecasting models use previous data to make accurate predictions regardless of their structural types, such as nonlinear, linear, short, and extended memory. Previous studies' findings have shown that the results produced by the models such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Radial Basis Function (RBF) [10], Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were sufficiently accurate and were suitable for forecasting hydrological time series [11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, in recent studies, gradient boosting-based regression algorithms such as extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient Boosting (Lightgbm) showed satisfactory results in forecasting problems.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forecasting models use previous data to make accurate predictions regardless of their structural types, such as nonlinear, linear, short, and extended memory. Previous studies' findings have shown that the results produced by the models such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Radial Basis Function (RBF) [10], Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were sufficiently accurate and were suitable for forecasting hydrological time series [11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, in recent studies, gradient boosting-based regression algorithms such as extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient Boosting (Lightgbm) showed satisfactory results in forecasting problems.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2021); Legates and Outcalt (2022); Pal et al. (2020); Rahmani and Fattahi (2021, 2022c, 2022a, 2022b). The hypothesis of long‐term persistence (LTP) in annual precipitation has been explored in a number of studies of point and grid scale data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Hurst has been used to characterize LTP across multiple disciplines, ranging from climate science to the analysis of internet traffic and the flow of blood in human arteries (O'Connell et al, 2016). Recent research on Hurst behavior in the climate and hydrology fields is reported by Adarsh et al (2020); Adarsh and Priya (2021); Benavides-Bravo et al (2021); ; ; Legates and Outcalt (2022); Pal et al (2020); Rahmani and Fattahi (2021, 2022c, 2022a, 2022b. The hypothesis of long-term persistence (LTP) in annual precipitation has been explored in a number of studies of point and grid scale data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%