“…As a valid (Rydwik et al, 2012;Verghese et al, 2011), reliable (Peters, Fritz, et al, 2013;Rydwik et al, 2012), and sensitive (Goldberg & Schepens, 2011;van Iersel, Munneke, Esselink, Benraad, & Olde Rikkert, 2008) measure, WS tests have found a home in both clinical (Peel, Kuys, & Klein, 2013) and research (Graham, Ostir, Fisher, & Ottenbacher, 2008) settings. Not only is WS indicative of an individual's functional capacity (Verghese et al, 2011) and general health status (Cesari et al, 2005;Studenski et al, 2011), the measure has been shown to be predictive of a range of outcomes, including response to rehabilitation (Goldie, Matyas, & Evans, 1996), functional dependence (Purser et al, 2005;Shimada et al, 2013;Shinkai et al, 2000), frailty (Castell et al, 2013), mobility disability (Cesari et al, 2005) (Rosano, Newman, Katz, Hirsch, & Kuller, 2008), cognitive decline (Alfaro-Acha, Al Snih, Raji, Markides, & Ottenbacher, 2007) (Inzitari et al, 2007), falls (Montero-Odasso et al, 2005) (Chu, Chi, & Chiu, 2005), institutionalization (Woo, Ho, & Yu, 1999), hospitalization (Montero-Odasso et al, 2005) (Cesari et al, 2005), cardiovascular-related events and mortality (Dumurgier et al, 2009;Matsuzawa et al, 2013), as well as all-cause mortality (Studenski et al, 2011) (Blain et al, 2010). An association has been observed between slow self-selected WS and lower quality of life (Ekstrom, Dahlin-Ivanoff, & Elmstahl, 2011), decreased participation (Ekstrom et al, 2011), and presence of depressive symptoms (Brandler, Wang, Oh-Park, Holtzer, & Verghese, 2012).…”