1971
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183x001100050047x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between Genetic Factors for Crown Rust Resistance and Yield in Oats1

Abstract: SummaryThrough a backcrossing program two series of oat (Avena sativa L.) lines were created, one early and one midseason, that were isogenetic except for genes that conditioned crown‐rust reaction. The lines were tested under crown rust epiphytotic and rust‐free environments, and three of the resistance genes were found associated with sizable deviations in grain yield under the rust‐free conditions. In both early and midseason genetic backgrounds the crown rust reaction gene from C.I. 8079, an Avena sterilis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility of this slight discrepancy might be explained by the fact that, although my mean yields were calculated from 80 sprayed plots, army worms, mentioned below, affected my yield data. However, kernel density correlated with my yield data, and kernel den sity seems to me more efficient than even kernel wt and yield because I was able to draw the same conclusions (except for isoline X5^1) from my kernel density data from one year ex periments as Frey and Browning (1971) did from their three year's yield data.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Isolinesmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One possibility of this slight discrepancy might be explained by the fact that, although my mean yields were calculated from 80 sprayed plots, army worms, mentioned below, affected my yield data. However, kernel density correlated with my yield data, and kernel den sity seems to me more efficient than even kernel wt and yield because I was able to draw the same conclusions (except for isoline X5^1) from my kernel density data from one year ex periments as Frey and Browning (1971) did from their three year's yield data.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Isolinesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In theory, there should be no difference among the yields and components of yield of these Isollnes, However, signifi cant differences do occur, even under rust-free conditions (Table 2; Frey and Browning, 1971). Therefore, yield, kernel wt, and kernel density data were converted to mean ratios of rusted to corresponding nonrusted lines to eliminate Inherent line differences in these characters.…”
Section: Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simms (1992) reviews numerous papers on physiological costs of resistance, but genetic studies are rare. Although some data have shown a fitness or yield cost in resistant genotypes, most have involved wide crosses or inbred lines where other loci may be in disequilibrium with resistance genes (Bergelson 1994;Brinkman and Frey 1977;Burdon and Muller 1987;Chaplin 1970;Frey and Browning 1971;Simons 1979). In one highly inbred species, Parker (1991) found nonadaptive evolution of disease resistance attributable to linkage disequilibrium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Escherichia coli, mutations causing resistance to virus T4 carry pleiotropic costs of resistance, which can be ameliorated by epistatic modifiers (Lenski 1988a,b). Several studies from habitually inbreeding species or near-isogenic lines are consistent with the existence of pleiotropic fitness costs (Bergelson 1994;Brinkman and Frey 1977;Burdon and Muller 1987;Chaplin 1970;Frey and Browning 1971;Simons 1979), but linkage disequilibrium and pleiotropy are confounded in these experiments. Additional evidence from ecological and physiological studies are also suggestive of genetic costs of resistance (reviewed in Simms 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%