Association Between Insurance Type and Outcomes of Reconstructive Head and Neck Cancer Surgery

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis Although the benefits of expanding health insurance coverage are clear, there are limited studies comparing the different types of insurance. This study aims to determine the association between insurance type and outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing reconstructive surgery in the United States. Methods Population‐based cross‐sectional study of the 2012–2014 National Inpatient Sample. We identified 1,314 patients with head and neck cancers undergoing tumor ablative surgery followed by pedicled or free flap reconstruction of oncologic defects. Insurance type was classified as private, Medicare, Medicaid, self‐pay, or other. The primary outcome was extended length of stay (LOS), defined as greater than 14 days, which represented the 75th percentile of the study sample. Secondary outcomes included acute medical complications, surgical complications, morbidities, and costs. Analyses were adjusted for gender, geographic location, and various medical comorbidities. Results In univariate analysis, insurance type was associated with extended LOS (P = .001), medical complications (P = <.001), and mortalities (P = .020). After controlling for other covariates in the multivariate analysis, compared to private insurance, Medicare and Medicaid were both associated with significantly higher odds of extended LOS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.73 [1.09–2.76] and 2.22 [1.38–3.58], respectively). Medicare was associated with significantly higher odds of medical complications, but Medicaid was not (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.53 [1.02–2.31] and 1.64 [0.97–2.78], respectively). Conclusions Medicaid and Medicare were independently associated with extended LOS after reconstructive head and neck cancer surgery. Medicare was associated with higher rates of medical complications. Efforts to address LOS should target care planning and coordination. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 132:1946–1952, 2022

Disparities in postoperative complications and perioperative events based on insurance status following elective spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Altogether, our results point to the unfortunate but likely possibility that Medicare patients are discriminated against in healthcare . Our results indicate that elderly patients on Medicare selectively compared with a younger group of patients not on Medicare are more likely to experience 90-day re-admission, NRD, extended LOS, any complication, and a medical complication–findings that extend in the fields of OBGYN [42] , head and neck cancer [43] , and orthopedics surgery [44] . This differential outcome could be explained by elderly patients generally experiencing more medical problems than younger individuals.…”

A Nationwide Analysis of Head and Neck Fibromatoses

“…Insurance status is a well‐known predictor of outcomes for various head and neck tumors 25 . Uninsured patients and those with Medicaid tend to have inferior outcomes, including extended length of stay and higher rates of complications.…”

“…Insurance status is a well-known predictor of outcomes for various head and neck tumors. 25 Uninsured patients and those with Medicaid tend to have inferior outcomes, including extended length of stay and higher rates of complications. Accordingly, our findings demonstrate longer survival for those with private insurances compared to Medicaid or Medicare.…”

Impact of the physical therapy–managed spinal orthoses program on cost of care in the hospital setting: a retrospective interrupted time-series study

“…Literature shows that orthoses help reduce the cost of medical care for Medicare patients after the hospital, possibly by keeping them more active [ 3 ]. Medicare requires specific documentation from durable medical equipment vendors to provide orthoses, and these patients can experience discharge delays due to requiring approvals, a common issue faced by Medicare patients [ 20–22 ]. The study results show that Medicare patients who benefited from the new orthosis delivery model experienced a 14.72-h reduction in time to mobilization ( Figure 4A and B ), leading to these patients becoming active sooner during their hospital stay.…”