Association between marijuana use and kidney stone: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2009 to 2018

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether regular marijuana use is related to history of kidney stones in the US population.Methods: Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2009 to 2018. Kidney stone and marijuana use data were collected from self-report questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression and multiple sensitivity analyses were applied to examine the relationship between marijuana usage and kidney stones.Results: There are approximately 26.04% of the US population have admitted to using marijuana in their lifetime. Compared with none regular users, those with a higher frequency of marijuana use were more males, more non-Hispanic races, lower than high school education, overweight, no recreational activity, without diabetes mellitus, and more coronary heart disease. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that marijuana use was inversely correlated to kidney stones in males (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, 95% Confidence interval [CI] = 0.54–0.97). One to seven times/week regular consumption of marijuana was associated with kidney stones in males (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.43–0.89). Sensitivity analyses validated the robustness of our outcomes.Conclusion: Our findings revealed that regular marijuana male users were inversely associated with kidney stones. Marijuana use one to six times/week was inversely related to the risk of kidney stones in males. Further studies are required to explore the dose and type associations of marijuana with kidney stones.

Association between monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and kidney stone: insights from NHANES

“…Individuals who responded "yes" were categorized as having kidney stones, while those who responded "no" were classified as not having kidney stones. The reliability of self-reported kidney stone history has been established in previous studies (3,4,7,(19)(20)(21).…”