2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism and autoimmune diseases susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have examined the association between the miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism and autoimmune diseases, including RA [8], SLE [8,9] and MS [19]. Although previous studies have suggested that many autoimmune diseases share common predisposing factors, the results are inconsistent [26]. In this hospital-based, case-control study, the allele and genotype frequencies of the miR-146a polymorphisms did not differ significantly between the MS patients and healthy controls; this result is consistent with Fenoglio's previous report [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have examined the association between the miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism and autoimmune diseases, including RA [8], SLE [8,9] and MS [19]. Although previous studies have suggested that many autoimmune diseases share common predisposing factors, the results are inconsistent [26]. In this hospital-based, case-control study, the allele and genotype frequencies of the miR-146a polymorphisms did not differ significantly between the MS patients and healthy controls; this result is consistent with Fenoglio's previous report [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% CI were used to assess the strength of the association between the analyzed polymorphisms and the disease. In meta-analyses, heterogeneity between all the analyses was determined by I 2 , and data with high heterogeneity ( I 2 >50%) were processed using a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model (24). All the statistical analyses were carried out using the GraphPad Prism 5 Software (www.graphpad.com), and the Review Manager 5.2 Software (Copenhagen, Denmark) was used for the meta-analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the homozygosity of C allele's protective role, the dominant model (CC + CG vs. GG) also shows that having at least one C allele has a protective effect in BD. Confoundly, in some studies, the CG genotype (Chen et al, 2013) and combined CG + GG (Zhang et al, 2014) genotypes are shown to be risk factors for autoimmune diseases in Asians and for psoriasis, respectively. When we evaluated rs28362491 and rs2910164 polymorphisms together, we did not find any significant differences between BD patients and the control groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%