Association Between Orthonasal Olfaction and Chemosensory Perception in Patients With Smell Loss

Abstract

Objectives Self‐ratings seem to be the most effortless strategy for assessment of patients' chemical senses. Notably, although flavor perception strongly relies on olfaction, the relationship between self‐reported flavor perception and orthonasal olfactory tests have hitherto not been considered. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between self‐perceived olfactory function (SO), taste (ST), and flavor perception (SF) and smell test results in patients with olfactory dysfunction (OD). Methods We included 203 patients with quantitative OD. Group comparison, bivariate correlation, and ordinal logistic regression were employed to quantify the relationships between predictor variables (age, gender, reason for OD, and orthonasal olfaction—summed scores of threshold, discrimination, and identification [TDI]) and outcomes of SO and SF (“impaired,” “average,” or “good”). Results Group comparison revealed significant differences between SO and SF ( P < .001). Stronger correlations were found between SO and TDI (r = 0.64), compared to SF and TDI (r = 0.27). No relevant correlation was found between ST and TDI (r = 0.10). Higher TDI was associated with odds of higher SO in univariate (odds ratio = 1.25) and multivariable analyses (adjusted odds ratio = 1.23), and both models showed good fit of data. Conversely, regression models on the associations between TDI and changes in SF did not meet the assumption of goodness of fit. Conclusion We found that higher orthonasal olfactory performance was associated with odds of higher SO in patients with OD, even after controlling for olfactory‐relevant factors. To the contrary, similar models based on flavor perception failed to describe these relationships. This indicates for SF and ST to be less represented by the TDI compared to SO. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 130:2213–2219, 2020

Epidemiological, otolaryngological, olfactory and gustatory outcomes according to the severity of COVID-19: a study of 2579 patients

“…For this reason, it is important to conduct future studies using psychophysical olfactory assessments and gustometry, so as to establish the potential association between these sense disorders. About the positive association between subjective and psychophysical olfactory evaluations, our results supported those of previous study [19].…”

Retronasal olfactory testing in early diagnosed and suspected COVID-19 patients: a 7-week follow-up study

“…One explanation may be that the 7-CST is a screening test and thus, slight changes in olfactory function remained undetected. Another reason may be the poor correlation between subjective and tested olfactory function in general [41,42] and particular in COVID-19 patients [33]. However, significant differences between subjective function of smell and flavour before the onset of symptoms, on the first day of testing and after 7 weeks were observed.…”

Long-term follow-up of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19: 6 months case–control study of health workers

“…However, there are few studies of the long-term evolution regarding OD and GD in COVID patients beyond the first weeks [ 4 , 17 ]. Likewise, no clear data is available on the association between OD and GD [ 11 ].…”

“…The reported prevalence of gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 infection is 43.93-56.4% [1,10]. Taste Dysfunction may also represent an early symptom suggestive of infection, but it remains unclear as to whether GD exists in COVID-19, or is a loss of retronasal smell [11]. This fact is due to the paucity of studies based on objective evidence for the measurement of GD since the reported prevalence of GD is mainly based on self-reported data [12].…”