Association between primary language, a lack of mammographic screening, and later stage breast cancer presentation

Abstract

Background Health determinants are known to influence the stage of breast cancer presentation, but it is unclear to what extent language affects stage. This study investigates whether non–English‐speaking (NES) patients present at a later stage than their English‐speaking (ES) counterparts and whether language is associated with mammographic screening. Methods This study was a retrospective, single‐institution cohort analysis of women undergoing breast radiotherapy from 2012 to 2017 (n = 1057). Patients were categorized as ES (n = 904) or NES (n = 153). Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified variables associated with later stage presentation, including language, race/ethnicity, and age. A subcohort analysis investigated the influence of mammographic screening on stage for NES patients. Results NES patients had greater odds of later stage disease than ES patients (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence, 1.001‐2.150). This association persisted across all races/ethnicities. An additional analysis examined age categories associated with mammographic screening. For women eligible for screening (ie, those 40‐50 years old or older than 50 years), there was a significant association between language and stage. NES patients older than 50 years were twice as likely to present at an advanced stage in comparison with ES patients (16.19% vs 8.11%; P = .0082). An additional subset analysis accounted for mammograms. NES patients who did not undergo screening had a higher probability of stage III disease (40.3% of NES patients vs 12.7% of ES patients). There was no difference in stage between NES and ES patients who did undergo screening. Conclusions Language is independently associated with later stage breast cancer for NES patients, regardless of race/ethnicity. NES patients may have difficulty in accessing the health care system. Future interventions should seek to reduce language barriers for mammographic screening and diagnosis.

Amyloid precursor protein promotes the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells by regulating the MAPK signaling pathway

“…Breast cancer is a serious threat to human health (1) and a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women, accounting for ~23% of female malignancies (2,3). With the development of medical technology and the prevalence of precancerous screening technology, breast cancer morbidity and mortality rates have declined in developed countries, but incidence and mortality are rising worldwide (4-6). Currently, the main treatment methods for breast cancer include surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as immunotherapy (7).…”

Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review

“…Differently, a large body of studies focuses on immigration status, which, particularly for recent immigrants, is demonstrated to negatively influence the rating for adherence to breast, cervical [29][30][31][32][33] and colorectal cancer screenings. 34,35 Difficulties related to the language represent one of the main obstacles, [36][37][38] along with cultural/religious beliefs. 39 These barriers are mainly reported whether culture/ religion are particularly sensitive towards "intimate areas" and "female body", 40 and cancer is considered as the unavoidable punishment for own sins.…”

A narrative review of sociodemographic risk and disparities in screening, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of the most common extrathoracic malignancies in the United States

“…There is a paucity of data associating primary language and patients with non-English speaking backgrounds and outcomes in breast cancer. One single institution study from a quaternary care academic center demonstrated that non-English speaking patients comprised of 15% of the total cohort and were more likely to present at later stages (18).…”