2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-013-1446-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between promoters polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinases and risk of digestive cancers: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Our meta-analysis demonstrated the fact that polymorphisms in promoter regions of MMP genes might be related to the susceptibility of digestive cancers, with cancer development for MMP1 and MMP7, and a protection against cancer for MMP2 and MMP9. Further evidences with adequate sample sizes need to be conducted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 In a large meta-analysis, Peng et al found that MMP2 (-1306C>T and -735C>T) and MMP7 -181A>G polymorphisms play allele-specific roles in cancer development, while the MMP9 -1562C>T polymorphism did not appear to be a major risk factor for cancer. 42 Another meta-analysis by Li et al, 43 focusing on digestive tract cancers, demonstrated an association of polymorphisms in the promoter regions of specific MMPs with increased (MMP1 and -7) or decreased (MMP2 and -9) susceptibility, while Yang et al 44 further suggested that the MMP7 -181A>G polymorphism may contribute to susceptibility to gastric cancer. In their meta-analysis of studies investigating the role of the -1171(5A>6A) polymorphism in the promoter region of MMP3, Yang et al 45 did not find an association with overall cancer risk, suggesting that this polymorphism may be related to a decreased cancer risk in general in Asian populations when specifically compared with gastrointestinal cancers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 In a large meta-analysis, Peng et al found that MMP2 (-1306C>T and -735C>T) and MMP7 -181A>G polymorphisms play allele-specific roles in cancer development, while the MMP9 -1562C>T polymorphism did not appear to be a major risk factor for cancer. 42 Another meta-analysis by Li et al, 43 focusing on digestive tract cancers, demonstrated an association of polymorphisms in the promoter regions of specific MMPs with increased (MMP1 and -7) or decreased (MMP2 and -9) susceptibility, while Yang et al 44 further suggested that the MMP7 -181A>G polymorphism may contribute to susceptibility to gastric cancer. In their meta-analysis of studies investigating the role of the -1171(5A>6A) polymorphism in the promoter region of MMP3, Yang et al 45 did not find an association with overall cancer risk, suggesting that this polymorphism may be related to a decreased cancer risk in general in Asian populations when specifically compared with gastrointestinal cancers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association studies revealed that the various SNPs within MMP2 , MMP9 and TIMP2 pre‐disposed to different disease states, for example bladder cancer susceptibility (Yan et al., ), prostate cancer (dos Reis et al., ), breast cancer development and survival (Slattery et al., ), digestive cancers (Li et al., ; Park, Kim, Kim, & Kim, ), head and neck cancer (Zhang et al., ), lung cancer (Wang & Cai, ), gallbladder cancer (Sharma, Misra, Kumar, & Mittal, ), retinal vein occlusion (Ortak et al., ) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk (Mocchegiani, Giacconi, & Costarelli, ; Tesfaigzi et al., ). However, there is no information available on the associations between MMP2 , MMP9 and TIMP2 and male infertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 are three important members of the MMP family, and previous studies reported that polymorphisms of MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 were associated with the risk and prognosis of several cancers such as bladder, gastric, breast, and oral cancer, as well as osteosarcoma (Pereira et al, 2012;Saeed et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2014;Wieczorek et al, 2014;Yan et al, 2014;Wen et al, 2014). Furthermore, there have been several reports on the association between MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 polymorphisms, and the development and prognosis of ESCC, but the results are inconsistent (Zhang et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2008;Bradbury et al, 2009;Peng et al, 2010;Li et al, 2013). The discrepancy between these results may be caused by variable genetic distributions in different populations, or dissimilar study designs and sample sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%