2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10092-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between selected antimicrobial resistance genes and antimicrobial exposure in Danish pig farms

Abstract: Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in pigs is an important public health concern due to its possible transfer to humans. We aimed at quantifying the relationship between the lifetime exposure of antimicrobials and seven antimicrobial resistance genes in Danish slaughter pig farms. AMR gene levels were quantified by qPCR of total-community DNA in faecal samples obtained from 681 batches of slaughter pigs. The lifetime exposure to antimicrobials was estimated at batch level for the piglet, weaner, and fini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the studies modelled phenotypic AMR, while few models represented genotypic AMR (Table 5 ). Modelling genotypic AMR can be more complicated as many genes can be linked to a specific antibiotic, and the relationship between gene abundance and antibiotic use seems to be more complex than first anticipated [ 65 ]. Modelling genotypic AMR requires the relevant genes for the modelled AMR to be represented, as well as circumstances allowing for the genetic AMR to be expressed as phenotypic AMR, leading to a spread of the resistant pathogen within the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the studies modelled phenotypic AMR, while few models represented genotypic AMR (Table 5 ). Modelling genotypic AMR can be more complicated as many genes can be linked to a specific antibiotic, and the relationship between gene abundance and antibiotic use seems to be more complex than first anticipated [ 65 ]. Modelling genotypic AMR requires the relevant genes for the modelled AMR to be represented, as well as circumstances allowing for the genetic AMR to be expressed as phenotypic AMR, leading to a spread of the resistant pathogen within the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the largest increases in AMR gene abundance were seen across all genes and in both classes of stock at the same time (W21-W24) which coincided with an increase in 16S rRNA gene copies, hence suggesting an as yet undefined environmental influence on bacterial load and consequently AMR gene abundance. A previous cross-sectional study highlighted that only 10-42% of the variation in AMR gene levels could be explained by factors included in statistical models (including lifetime antimicrobial exposure), suggesting that AMR gene levels are strongly influenced by a variety of other elements 43 . Whilst these could be related to feed changes, the fact that the dry sows and young pigs were housed differently and fed different diets 44 would suggest that this effect is due to some other factors affecting the entire farm, such as housing and management 35,45,46 , environmental conditions 46 or the introduction of an infectious agent.…”
Section: Changes In Amr Gene Abundances Were Not Associated With Antimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance of the high proportion of positive samples in the Canadian broilers at 1 year after the cessation of administration of ceftiofur could be explained by environmental contamination which may have persisted after birds ceased to excrete E. coli positive for ESBL/AmpC resistance genes (24). Antimicrobial use causing coselection to other antimicrobial classes, such as penicillin and amoxicillin in the breeder, could also be an important factor (30). For example, Danish broiler flocks which did not receive ceftiofur in ovo (whereas their breeders received it) had significantly higher occurrences of bla CMY-2 when aminopenicillins were used up to 6 months before sampling (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%