Association between socioeconomic status and obesity in a Chinese adult population

Abstract

BackgroundExisting studies which regarding to the association between individual socioeconomic status (SES) and obesity are still scarce in developing countries. The major aim of this study is to estimate such association in an adult population which was drawn from an economically prosperous province of China.MethodsStudy population was determined by multilevel randomized sampling. Education and income were chosen as indicators of individual SES, general obesity and abdominal obesity were measured by body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). Descriptive statistical methods were used to depict overall and factor-specific distributions of general and abdominal obesity among 16,013 respondents. Two-step logistic regression models were fitted on gender basis.ResultsThe age-and-sex adjusted rates of general overweight, general obesity, abdominal overweight and abdominal obesity in study population were 28.9% (95%CI: 27.9%-29.9%), 7.5% (95%CI: 7.0%-8.1%), 32.2% (95%CI: 31.2%-33.3%) and 12.3% (95%CI: 11.6%-13.1%), respectively. Based on model fitting results, a significant inverse association between education and obesity only existed in women, while in men, income rather than education was positively related to obesity.ConclusionsThe atypical SES-obesity relationship we found reflected the on-going social economy transformation in affluent regions of China. High-income men and poorly-educated women were at higher risk of obesity in Zhejiang province, thus merit intense focuses.

Does Consumer Behaviour on Meat Consumption Increase Obesity? - Empirical Evidence from European Countries

“…Higher education which means higher level of activities and more consciousness of proper food and health helps the probability of having lower BMI than the low educated people. Xiao et al (2013) finds similar results only for low educated women in rural China but this paper finds this association for both men and women in the European countries. An increase in the hours of physical exercise doesn't produce any significant correlation with increasing BMI except the expected negative sign.…”

“…Soup consumption is not associated with metabolic syndrome however; there is an inverse relationship between soup consumption and body weight status in US adults (Zhu and Hollis, 2013). Xiao et al (2013) used education and income as the indicator of socio-economics status in response to BMI. Study finds that less education of the women is positively associated with higher BMI whereas higher income of men is positively associated with higher BMI in Zhejiang province of China.…”

The global burden of liver disease: The major impact of China

“…The ageand sex-adjusted rates of overall obesity and central obesity in the Chinese adult population were 7.5% and 12.3%, respectively. 25 Central obesity is thought to be more pathogenic than overall obesity and is significantly correlated with diabetes, metabolic syndrome (MetS), and NAFLD. 26 According to the China Health and Nutrition Survey, which was conducted from 1993 to 2009, the age-standardized prevalence of central obesity among Chinese adults with body mass index >25 kg/m 2 increased from 11.9% to 21.1%.…”

Causation or selection – examining the relation between education and overweight/obesity in prospective observational studies: a meta‐analysis

“…Not only is obesity linked to lower life expectancy, but obesity as well as overweight is also associated with various health risks such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, diabetes, hypertension, lower quality of life and decreased general health (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Numerous studies have stressed that the risk of overweight and obesity depends on one's educational level that can be considered as a measure for one's socioeconomic status (SES) (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Research on the social determinants of health suggests that material, psychosocial and behavioural factors contribute to the explanation of educational inequalities in overweight and obesity (16)(17)(18).…”