Association between suicidal ideation and suicide: meta-analyses of odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value

Abstract

BackgroundThe expression of suicidal ideation is considered to be an important warning sign for suicide. However, the predictive properties of suicidal ideation as a test of later suicide are unclear.AimsTo assess the strength of the association between suicidal ideation and later suicide measured by odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV).MethodWe located English-language studies indexed in PubMed that reported the expression or non-expression of suicidal ideation among people who later died by suicide or did not. A random effects meta-analysis was used to assess the pooled OR, sensitivity, specificity and PPV of suicidal ideation for later suicide among groups of people from psychiatric and non-psychiatric settings.ResultsThere was a moderately strong but highly heterogeneous association between suicidal ideation and later suicide (n = 71, OR = 3.41, 95% CI 2.59–4.49, 95% prediction interval 0.42–28.1, I2 = 89.4, Q-value = 661, d.f.(Q) = 70, P ≤0.001). Studies conducted in primary care and other non-psychiatric settings had similar pooled odds to studies of current and former psychiatric patients (OR = 3.86 v. OR = 3.23, P = 0.7). The pooled sensitivity of suicidal ideation for later suicide was 41% (95% CI 35–48) and the pooled specificity was 86% (95% CI 76–92), with high between-study heterogeneity. Studies of suicidal ideation expressed by current and former psychiatric patients had a significantly higher pooled sensitivity (46% v. 22%) and lower pooled specificity (81% v. 96%) than studies conducted in non-psychiatric settings. The PPV among non-psychiatric cohorts (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1%–0.5%) was significantly lower (Q-value = 35.6, P < 0.001) than among psychiatric samples (3.9%, 95% CI 2.2–6.6).ConclusionsEstimates of the extent of the association between suicidal ideation and later suicide are limited by unexplained between-study heterogeneity. The utility of suicidal ideation as a test for later suicide is limited by a modest sensitivity and low PPV.Declaration interestM.M.L. and C.J.R. have provided expert evidence in civil, criminal and coronial matters. I.B.H. has been a Commissioner in Australia's National Mental Health Commission since 2012. He is the Co-Director, Health and Policy at the Brain and Mind Centre (BMC) University of Sydney. The BMC operates an early-intervention youth services at Camperdown under contract to Headspace. I.B.H. has previously led community-based and pharmaceutical industry-supported (Wyeth, Eli Lily, Servier, Pfizer, AstraZeneca) projects focused on the identification and better management of anxiety and depression. He is a Board Member of Psychosis Australia Trust and a member of Veterans Mental Health Clinical Reference group. He was a member of the Medical Advisory Panel for Medibank Private until October 2017. He is the Chief Scientific Advisor to, and an equity shareholder in, InnoWell. InnoWell has been formed by the University of Sydney and PricewaterhouseCoopers to administer the $30 M Australian Government Funded Project Synergy. Project Synergy is a 3-year programme for the transformation of mental health services through the use of innovative technologies.

Suicidal Ideation and Severity of Distress among Refugees Residing in Asylum Accommodations in Sweden

“…However, there are alternative reports indicating that the item is not accurate enough to be used as a suicide screener [31]. A meta-analysis assessing the general association between suicidal ideation and suicide questions the overall utility of suicidal ideation as a test for later suicide [32]. Although an association between expressed suicidal ideation and subsequent suicide was found, the positive predictive value of suicidal ideation for future death by suicide was low: 60% of the individuals who later died by suicide had not expressed any suicidal ideation.…”

Prevalence and Characteristics Associated with Chronic Noncancer Pain in Suicide Decedents: A National Study

“…Although increased screening of suicidal behaviors in primary care has been recommended (O'Connor et al ), it is important to acknowledge that only a minority of people with suicidal ideation will make a suicide attempt and even fewer will die by suicide (Carroll et al, ). Importantly, the predictive value of suicidal ideation for subsequent suicide is significantly lower in nonpsychiatric cohorts such as primary health care or general population samples than among people who receive psychiatric care (McHugh et al, ). Increasing access to other treatment options, especially pain management programs, would be preferable to simply restricting access to necessary medications in people with suicidal ideation.…”

BJPsych Open fifth anniversary editorial: history, accomplishments, trajectory and passion

“…case analysis with literature review 14 • Trends in female authorship in research papers on eating disorders: 20-year bibliometric study 15 • The prevalence and treatment outcomes of antineuronal antibody-positive patients admitted with first episode of psychosis 16 • Mother and baby units matter: improved outcomes for both 17 • Suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-harm: national prevalence study of young adults 18 • Association between suicidal ideation and suicide: meta-analyses of odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value 19 • Predicting major mental illness: ethical and practical considerations 20 • Indirect costs of depression and other mental and behavioural disorders for Australia from 2015 to 2030 21 • Social gradients in the receipt of medication for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and young people in Sheffield 22 • Long-term subjective memory after electroconvulsive therapy 23 The breadth of published articles ranges from treatment efficacy to adverse effects, from nonadherence to social gradients in prescriptions, from forensic psychiatry to mental health law, from ethics to global mental health, from history of terminology to guidelines, from digital mental health to determination of value and healthcare economics, from neuropsychiatry to perinatal psychiatry, from stigma to quality of life…and the list goes on.…”