2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between the Foot Posture Index and running related injuries: A case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Finally, we did not exactly control how much participants were running during the course of the study, but self-report running time (ASFO group = 109 ± 19 vs SFO group = 107 ± 18) and running distance (ASFO group = 14.3 ± 3.2 vs SFO group = 13.6 ± 3.5 km) at the beginning of the study were similar in both groups. In addition, the running surface type might be associated with injury 38 but both groups run in similar terrains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Finally, we did not exactly control how much participants were running during the course of the study, but self-report running time (ASFO group = 109 ± 19 vs SFO group = 107 ± 18) and running distance (ASFO group = 14.3 ± 3.2 vs SFO group = 13.6 ± 3.5 km) at the beginning of the study were similar in both groups. In addition, the running surface type might be associated with injury 38 but both groups run in similar terrains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many factors may contribute to pathology and injury, the presence of abnormal foot alignment can negatively affect lower extremity biomechanics and be associated with injuries. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Abnormal pronation is typically defined by excessive calcaneal eversion, plantarflexion and adduction of the talus, collapse of the medial longitudinal arch, and abduction of the forefoot on the hindfoot. Abnormal pronation has been associated with increased foot mobility, collapse of the transverse arch, and compensatory knee and hip medial rotation.…”
Section: Biomechanical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, assessment of hindfoot and forefoot ROM should include evaluating subtalar, calcaneocuboid, and talonavicular joint mobility. Because foot alignment is commonly associated with forefoot pathology, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] the Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI-6) can be used to assess static weight bearing alignment in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes and classify foot type as being normal, abnormally pronated, or abnormally supinated (Table 1). 47 A total score of 0 to +4 on the FPI-6 indicates a normal foot posture Manually reposition the laterally displaced sesamoids.…”
Section: Evaluation and Treatment Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 80% of runners reporting PF had either pes planus or pes cavus. Previous studies also highlighted the importance of foot arch for RRIs (Kaufman et al, 1999;Pérez-Morcillo et al, 2019;Williams et al, 2001). A recent study showed that pes planus and cavus are associated with 20 to 77 times higher odds of RRIs than normal feet, respectively (Pérez-Morcillo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Foot Arch Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies also highlighted the importance of foot arch for RRIs (Kaufman et al, 1999;Pérez-Morcillo et al, 2019;Williams et al, 2001). A recent study showed that pes planus and cavus are associated with 20 to 77 times higher odds of RRIs than normal feet, respectively (Pérez-Morcillo et al, 2019). A systematic review reported that pes planus and cavus are associated with lower limb injuries (Tong and Kong, 2013).…”
Section: Foot Arch Typementioning
confidence: 99%