2017
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between the p.V37I variant of GJB2 and hearing loss: a pedigree and meta-analysis

Abstract: Pathogenic variants in the gap junction protein beta-2 (GJB2) gene are the most common cause of hearing loss. Of these, the p.V37I variant of GJB2 has a high allele frequency (up to 10%) in East Asians. Characterization of the phenotypic spectrum associated with p.V37I, as well as the role of this variant in the onset of hearing loss could have a remarkable effect on future diagnostic strategies. Here, we performed a pedigree analysis of unrelated families exhibiting various hearing phenotypes, and then conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, half of them were observations from deaf families with several affected family members where genetic etiology of hearing loss could be expected. With one exception (19) they also occurred in association with those GJB2 variants which generally cause hearing loss of mild to moderate degree, such as c.269T>C, c.235delC and c.109G>A. Additionally, patients homozygous or compound heterozygous for the variant c.109G>A have often delayed hearing loss onset and rarely they may even have normal hearing, which led to past concerns regarding its pathogenicity (22,23). Moreover, SSNHL episodes in previously published cases did not occur in normal hearing individuals, but as a rapid worsening of previously diagnosed hearing loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, half of them were observations from deaf families with several affected family members where genetic etiology of hearing loss could be expected. With one exception (19) they also occurred in association with those GJB2 variants which generally cause hearing loss of mild to moderate degree, such as c.269T>C, c.235delC and c.109G>A. Additionally, patients homozygous or compound heterozygous for the variant c.109G>A have often delayed hearing loss onset and rarely they may even have normal hearing, which led to past concerns regarding its pathogenicity (22,23). Moreover, SSNHL episodes in previously published cases did not occur in normal hearing individuals, but as a rapid worsening of previously diagnosed hearing loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the genetic cause of NSHL in this proband, we routinely applied a Sanger sequencing of four common HL-associated genes, including gap junction protein beta-2 ( GJB2 ), gap junction protein beta-3 ( GJB3 ), solute carrier family 26 member 4 ( SLC26A4 ) and mitochondrially encoded 12S RNA ( MT-RNR1 ). DNA preparation, PCR conditions and Sanger sequencing process were described previously [23]. The coding regions of GJB2 and GJB3 , hotspot region (exon7–8 and exon19) of SLC26A4 , and the full-length region of MT-RNR1 were carefully screened, only a homozygous variant, m.827A > G within MT-RNR1 , was identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be reassuring for clinicians that over 85% of all presumably pathogenic variants were ultra-rare with observed AFs below 0.05% in bottom-up analysis. However, application of the gnomAD and ExAC filtering AF to 74 reported variants with unexpectedly high observed AFs (i.e., over our AF thresholds) allowed us to safely consider 47 variants with still high filtering AFs as not likely NSHL-related, with the notorious exception of one variant ( GJB2 c.109G > A; p.Val37Ile) 23 . Two pathogenic variants identified by the NSHL-specific ACMG guidelines were among those reclassified from “common” to “rare” by application of the filtering AF, suggesting high clinical utility and accuracy of the AF thresholds determined in this study: 0.1% for dominant genes and 0.6% for recessive genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%