Association between the physical activity level and the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Çolak, Tuğba Kuru; Acar, Gönül; Dereli, Elif Elçin; Özgül, Bahar; Demırbüken, İlkşan; Alkac, Cigdem; Polat, Mi̇ne Gülden

doi:10.1589/jpts.28.142

Cited by 42 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All three studies which included a comparison group report people with T2D to have higher levels of SB than those without T2D . Studies which subjectively measured SB report variable outcomes including: >3 hours/day watching TV (38.1%); mean sitting time/day (4.8–5.8 hours); and mean sitting time/week (302 minutes/week) …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

Kennerly

Kirk

2018

Practical Diabetes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regular physical activity and low levels of prolonged sedentary behaviour are important lifestyle recommendations for the management of type 2 diabetes. This systematic review collates and summarises published research reporting on physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adults with type 2 diabetes. Systematic searches with three databases were conducted (Medline; PubMed; SportDiscus). Intervention studies were excluded. Studies were eligible if they: (i) were published in English; (ii) were published between 1997 and January 2017; and (iii) objectively and/or subjectively measured physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour in adults with type 2 diabetes. Two reviewers independently cross‐checked studies, conducted a quality assessment and extracted data. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis. The search identified 349 studies; 29 eligible studies were included. All studies measured physical activity and 15 studies measured sedentary behaviour. Twenty studies used subjective methods, six used objective methods and three used both subjective and objective methods. Most studies report low levels of physical activity and high levels of sedentary behaviour in adults with type 2 diabetes and note adults with type 2 diabetes to be less active and more sedentary than those without type 2 diabetes. Regardless of measurement method or study location, adults with type 2 diabetes report low levels of physical activity and high levels of sedentary behaviour and are less active and more sedentary than those without type 2 diabetes. There is a need for large‐scale interventions which support active lifestyles to be implemented into diabetes care. Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

Kennerly

Kirk

2018

Practical Diabetes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[67][68][69][70] It is shown they can improve blood glucose control, reduce cardiovascular risk factors, improve well-being and assist in weight loss. [71][72][73] An exercise intervention of a period of eight weeks at least, can reduce the level of HbA1c by 0.66% in people with DM, even if there is no weight loss. People with DM should be advised to break the time they spend being sedentary with brief standing, walking or performing other light activities.…”

Section: Physical Activitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care

Lambrinou

Hansen

Beulens³

2019

Eur J Prev Cardiolog

173

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although management of diabetes mellitus is improving, inadequately managed cases still exist. Prevention of diabetes mellitus requires an integrated and holistic approach based on the origin of the disease. In Europe only half of diagnosed patients with diabetes mellitus have good glycaemic control. Inadequate glycaemic control is significantly increasing the use of healthcare resources, the medical costs and mortality rates. A review was conducted in order to summarise and discuss central themes for prevention. A search of the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane and Google Scholar between January 2010–May 2019 was undertaken. The following keywords: ‘diabetes mellitus’, ‘cardiovascular diseases’, ‘empowerment’, ‘self-management education’ and ‘lifestyle factors’ were used in different combinations to identify eligible articles. Important variables for the prevention of diabetes mellitus and its complications are self-management of diabetes mellitus and the management of risk factors. Education and support for self-management are fundamental when caring for people with a chronic disease like diabetes mellitus. In order to achieve effective self-management including lifestyle modification it is also crucial to motivate people. In this review, the role of the three main pillars in diabetes care are identified and discussed; patient empowerment, self-management education and lifestyle modification in the management of people with diabetes mellitus.

show abstract

“…However, the QOL of people with type 2 diabetes remains low, and this is a major social issue. [7][8][9] Factors influencing QOL include physical, social, and psychological conditions. One previous study showed that improvements in exercise habits and diet resulted in better QOL, 8 suggesting that self-management of diet and exercise are necessary for improving QOL.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Conceptual Model for Quality of Life Among People with Type 2 Diabetes in the Philippines

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The increased prevalence of chronic diseases is a social issue in developing countries. Methods To create a conceptual model representing the quality of life of low-income people with type 2 diabetes in the Philippines, 117 low-income adult participants in a public support group were studied, and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores on quality of life (QOL) were analyzed in terms of their relationships with the following factors: basic attributes, physical factors (glycated hemoglobin level, complications, comorbidities, and symptoms), social factors (support, education, and financial status), and cognitive factors (knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, and self-management behavior). Results Based on correlation coefficients among variables and goodness-of-fit test results through a path analysis, 2 models representing causal relationships were created, both of which showed sufficient goodness-of-fit. Conclusion Glycated hemoglobin levels, knowledge of blood glucose levels, self-efficacy, and self-management behavior (exercise) influenced PCS scores, while age, glycated hemoglobin levels, neuropathy, knowledge of insulin, self-efficacy, and self-management behavior (exercise) influenced MCS scores. The influence of self-efficacy was prominent in both cases, providing an important insight for healthcare professionals to develop effective support methods.

show abstract

Association between the physical activity level and the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cited by 42 publications

References 31 publications

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care

A Conceptual Model for Quality of Life Among People with Type 2 Diabetes in the Philippines

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About