2022
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between vaccination and immunobullous disorders: a brief, updated systematic review with focus on COVID‐19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 The results of our recent systematic review on the association between COVID‐19 vaccination and AIBDs support this finding to some extent, showing that the hypothesized relationship is, if at all, at least a rather rare event. 2 Out of 932 published post‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐vaccinal cases (mostly mRNA vaccines), only about 6% presented clinically with de novo AIBDs and 10% had a flare or worsening of pre‐existing AIBDs being usually well controlled with standard immunosuppressive treatment, whereas vaccination did not negatively influence the clinical course in all remaining patients. 2 Likewise, the validity of supposed induction or triggering of AIBDs by COVID‐19 vaccines is limited, taking into account that the summarized data are generally based on single case reports with a low level of evidence and a cross‐sectional study biased by subjective patient self‐reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… 1 The results of our recent systematic review on the association between COVID‐19 vaccination and AIBDs support this finding to some extent, showing that the hypothesized relationship is, if at all, at least a rather rare event. 2 Out of 932 published post‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐vaccinal cases (mostly mRNA vaccines), only about 6% presented clinically with de novo AIBDs and 10% had a flare or worsening of pre‐existing AIBDs being usually well controlled with standard immunosuppressive treatment, whereas vaccination did not negatively influence the clinical course in all remaining patients. 2 Likewise, the validity of supposed induction or triggering of AIBDs by COVID‐19 vaccines is limited, taking into account that the summarized data are generally based on single case reports with a low level of evidence and a cross‐sectional study biased by subjective patient self‐reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“… 2 Out of 932 published post‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐vaccinal cases (mostly mRNA vaccines), only about 6% presented clinically with de novo AIBDs and 10% had a flare or worsening of pre‐existing AIBDs being usually well controlled with standard immunosuppressive treatment, whereas vaccination did not negatively influence the clinical course in all remaining patients. 2 Likewise, the validity of supposed induction or triggering of AIBDs by COVID‐19 vaccines is limited, taking into account that the summarized data are generally based on single case reports with a low level of evidence and a cross‐sectional study biased by subjective patient self‐reports. 2 , 3 In addition, our previous investigation with healthy individuals who received the mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine revealed that circulating anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies do not cross‐react with pemphigus or pemphigoid autoantigens including desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, envoplakin, BP180, BP230 and type VII collagen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 2 Recently, several reports of pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid after COVID‐19 vaccination have been published. 3 In this study, we emphasized the incidence of pemphigus foliaceous after vaccination while other remarkable investigations described cases of de novo bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris or flare‐up of these diseases. 4 , 5 In the review of the literature, we have found three other new cases of pemphigus foliaceous after the administration of COVID‐19 vaccines (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 91%