1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02899.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association‐Dissociation Behaviour and Hydrodynamic Properties of Apoferritin Monomer and Dimer

Abstract: The association behaviour of a homogeneous preparation of apoferritin has been investigated. Contrary to studies by other authors on less pure material, no evidence for a reversible association of the protein was detected in sedimentation equilibrium, light scattering or sedimentation velocity experiments. Correspondingly, no dissociation of an isolated dimer of apoferritin was observed. Hydrodynamic parameters, such as frictional ratio and intrinsic viscosity, indicate that both apoferritin monomer and dimer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dimer is predicted to occur at s 2 ~ 24.4 S based on the relationship s 2 / s 1 = ( M 2 / M 1 ) 2/3 for same shaped molecules and using the average s 1 = 15.4 S for the monomer ( vide supra ). This type of sedimentation pattern has been reported previously for solutions of apoHoSF in which the higher molecular weight species at ~ 24 S have been determined to be apoHoSF dimers [56,57,59]. The Gaussian linewidth σ obs = σ shell = 6.5 G for the monomeric species in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dimer is predicted to occur at s 2 ~ 24.4 S based on the relationship s 2 / s 1 = ( M 2 / M 1 ) 2/3 for same shaped molecules and using the average s 1 = 15.4 S for the monomer ( vide supra ). This type of sedimentation pattern has been reported previously for solutions of apoHoSF in which the higher molecular weight species at ~ 24 S have been determined to be apoHoSF dimers [56,57,59]. The Gaussian linewidth σ obs = σ shell = 6.5 G for the monomeric species in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In our work, s values ranged from 14.3 to 16.7 S for various apoprotein samples prepared from commercially supplied horse spleen ferritin and from protein isolated in our laboratory. This large range reflects oxidative damage to the protein, the tendency of the protein to cross-link to form dimers and higher order oligomers and the inherent heterogeneity associated with the variable subunit composition of the protein itself [49,53,56,57,59,65,7678]. From s 20, w = 17.0 S, M = 484,120 g/mol and R = 8.3145 × 10 7 erg-K −1 mol −1 , we calculate through D20,w=s20,w·RTM·(1ν¯ρ20,w) Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apoferritin (Sigma) was run as a standard. Apoferritin ‘monomer’ migrates at 450 kDa with a ‘dimer’ at 900 kDa; Stokes radius of the monomer has been calculated at 16.6S (Bjork 1973; de Haen 1987), consistent with the elution profile of monomer after the proteasome activity peak at 20–26S.…”
Section: Gel Filtration Chromatographysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The heavier band (3-5% of the total) moved at about twice the velocity as the major band (>95%) indicating the presence of a contaminating dimer (18). The sedimentation value of the major band was 15S, a value smaller that typically found (18) for apo MF (16-18s at zero protein concentration), but perhaps is due to the non ideality of these solutions at the high protein concentrations required to monitor protein movement at 400 nm. Taken together, the results strongly indicate that the yellow color is an integral property of apo MF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Sedimentation velocity measurements at 48,000 rpm at protein concentrations of 15-25 mg/mI, following protein movement at 400 nm, established two protein sedimentation bands. The heavier band (3-5% of the total) moved at about twice the velocity as the major band (>95%) indicating the presence of a contaminating dimer (18). The sedimentation value of the major band was 15S, a value smaller that typically found (18) for apo MF (16-18s at zero protein concentration), but perhaps is due to the non ideality of these solutions at the high protein concentrations required to monitor protein movement at 400 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%