2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09470-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of a novel 27-gene immuno-oncology assay with efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies represent a major advance in treating a variety of advanced-stage malignancies. Nevertheless, only a subset of patients benefit, even when selected based on approved biomarkers such as PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden. New biomarkers are needed to maximize the therapeutic ratio of these therapies. Methods In this retrospective cohort, we assessed a 27-gene RT-qPCR immuno-oncology (IO) gene exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using data from a real-world UNC-108 cohort, the results confirmed the findings of the IMvigor210 study that the IO score is associated with the efficacy of ICI therapy in mUC [18]. Furthermore, this was accomplished using the same binary classification threshold used in all previous studies, and this study will discuss the potential of an evidence-based likelihood of response assessment to inform therapeutic sequencing in the treatment of advanced mUC [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using data from a real-world UNC-108 cohort, the results confirmed the findings of the IMvigor210 study that the IO score is associated with the efficacy of ICI therapy in mUC [18]. Furthermore, this was accomplished using the same binary classification threshold used in all previous studies, and this study will discuss the potential of an evidence-based likelihood of response assessment to inform therapeutic sequencing in the treatment of advanced mUC [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The IO score classifies cases as positive or negative based on their correlation to established gene expression centroids for immunomodulatory, mesenchymal, and mesenchymal stem-like subtypes [23]. The classification threshold was previously established in breast and lung cancers and validated as a classifier for mUC using TCGA and IMvigor210 datasets [15][16][17][18][19]. To assess data for the UNC-108 cohort, RNA expression analysis was used to determine the IO score of patients with available data downloaded from GSE176307 using the requisite 27-genes as previously described (ITM2A gene missing, Cohen's κ = 0.99 from TCGA-BLCA (RRID:SCR_003193; Project: Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Table S1).…”
Section: Io Score Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An ideal biomarker for predicting ICI benefit would perform well across many tumor types and treatment indications, would be independent of clinicopathologic features, and would improve on currently established biomarkers. The IO Score has been previously shown to be associated with improved response to ICI therapy in NSCLC and TNBC [ 11 15 ]. Consistent with the hypothesis that the IO Score classifies three components of the TIME that are common to tumors of epithelial origin, IM, MSL (linked with the expression of cancer associated fibroblasts) and M, we tested whether the IO Score would be applicable to classification of bladder cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IO Score has been validated as a biomarker that identifies patients likely to benefit from ICIs in TNBC and NSCLC [11][12][13][14][15]. These studies were conducted across tumor types using the same threshold of positivity for IO Score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%