Association of Anticancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessed in Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract

ImportanceThe association of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with patient quality of life has been poorly explored.ObjectiveTo evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of immunotherapy-based treatments.Data SourcesThis systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis used RCTs identified in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to June 1, 2021.Study SelectionA total of 2259 RCTs were identified that assessed ICIs as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or combined with another ICI and/or targeted therapy vs control groups not containing immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Studies were reviewed independently by 2 authors.Data Extraction and SynthesisThis meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and recommendations of the Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data Consortium.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe coprimary aims of the meta-analysis were (1) pooled differences between treatment groups in the mean change of PRO score from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up and (2) pooled differences between treatment groups in the time to deterioration of PRO score. For each end point, RCTs have been analyzed according to the type of treatment administered in the experimental group: ICIs given as monotherapy, ICIs combined with chemotherapy, or ICIs in association with another ICI and/or with targeted therapies.ResultsOf the 2259 identified RCTs, 34 (18 709 patients) met the selection criteria and were analyzed. In the group of 19 RCTs testing ICIs as monotherapy, the pooled between-groups difference of mean change from baseline to 12 weeks of follow-up was 4.6 (95% CI, 2.8-6.4), and the mean change from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up was 6.1 (95% CI, 4.2-8.1), significantly favoring ICIs. The pooled difference was 1.4 (95% CI, −0.4 to 3.2) at week 12 and 2.5 (95% CI, −0.8 to 5.9) at week 24 in the group of 8 RCTs testing ICIs combined with chemotherapy and 2.1 (95% CI, −0.8 to 5.0) at week 12 and 2.1 (95% CI, −0.4 to 4.5) at week 24 in the group of 8 RCTs testing other ICI-containing combinations. The time to deterioration was significantly longer in the immunotherapy-containing groups compared with control groups in all 3 groups of RCTs evaluated (hazard ratios of 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.91] for ICIs as monotherapy, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78-1.00] for ICIs plus chemotherapy, and 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.96] for other ICI-containing combinations).Conclusions and RelevanceImmune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy appear to have a favorable association with patient-reported quality of life and can be combined with other classes of anticancer drugs without worsening this quality of life.

The Sarcoma-Specific Instrument to Longitudinally Assess Health-Related Outcomes of the Routine Care Cycle

“…If we want to assess the health of sarcoma patients using the WPHS framework, we need to assess a broad range of outcomes. There is already a multitude of PROMs for sarcoma patients available, both for assessing experience and outcomes of treatment [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Ideally, the information assessed through PROMs in sarcoma could be integrated in some overall sarcoma-specific instrument to define quality of care.…”

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

“…This review sheds light on a specific class of immunotherapy called immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). There are a large number of previous and ongoing clinical trials to investigate the role of CPIs in the treatment of a wide range of cancer types, signifying the importance of this class of immunotherapy [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Journal literature in the PubMed engine has been researched for the last decade to formulate the main aspects to be included in the review.…”

Retrospective analysis: checkpoint inhibitor accessibility for thoracic and head and neck cancers and factors influencing it in a tertiary centre in India

“…Multiple new advances were seen in oncology in the last 2 to 3 decades such as robotic surgery, proton therapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Among these checkpoint inhibitors are probably the only ones that have shown an overall survival benefit in multiple settings in randomised clinical trials [12][13][14]. Hence, having access to these life-saving medications is important.…”