2012
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-012-0044-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Anticholinergic Burden with Cognitive and Functional Status in a Cohort of Hospitalized Elderly: Comparison of the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale and Anticholinergic Risk Scale

Abstract: Drugs with anticholinergic properties identified by the ACB scale and ARS are associated with worse cognitive and functional performance in elderly patients. The ACB scale might permit a rapid identification of drugs potentially associated with cognitive impairment in a dose-response pattern, but the ARS is better at rating activities of daily living.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
137
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
137
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, by using a nationwide cohort of older adults with fairly long followup, our study allows headtohead comparisons of longitudinal anticholiner gic burden derived from the ARS, ACB, and DBIAch scales and associated clinical outcomes, which have not been previously reported in the literature. Some other studies have tried to compare the ARS and ACB, but were limited by their small sample sizes 15,28 and a 1time crosssectional study design. 17 Second, our study provides important insights by linking anticho linergic burden to 4 key clinical outcomes, whereas most existing studies have examined only the discrep ancies between scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, by using a nationwide cohort of older adults with fairly long followup, our study allows headtohead comparisons of longitudinal anticholiner gic burden derived from the ARS, ACB, and DBIAch scales and associated clinical outcomes, which have not been previously reported in the literature. Some other studies have tried to compare the ARS and ACB, but were limited by their small sample sizes 15,28 and a 1time crosssectional study design. 17 Second, our study provides important insights by linking anticho linergic burden to 4 key clinical outcomes, whereas most existing studies have examined only the discrep ancies between scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 To date, no consensus has been reached regarding which scoring system is most useful in clinical settings. Moreover, existing studies of the various scoring sys tems have a variety of limitations: evaluation of only a single system, 1214 application of different cutoff values for anticholinergic burden between scoring systems, small sample sizes, 15,16 crosssectional designs, 15,16 and short followup periods 17 (≤1 year). All of these limita tions preclude a clear answer to this clinical question.…”
Section: Fei-yuan Hsiao Phdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ultimately, the risk of falls increases and function is impaired. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] This problem is especially important in older people because there is an age-related increase in the risk of anticholinergic toxicity owing to a decline in cholinergic transmission and increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier. 12 With polypharmacy so prevalent in the older population, it is not surprising that an older patient could be taking several anticholinergic medications that contribute to or worsen the pres entation of geriatric syndromes such as confusion and falls.…”
Section: Anticholinergic Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%