2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Artificial Intelligence–Aided Chest Radiograph Interpretation With Reader Performance and Efficiency

Abstract: IMPORTANCEThe efficient and accurate interpretation of radiologic images is paramount. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) engine used concurrently can improve reader performance and efficiency in interpreting chest radiograph abnormalities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter cohort study was conducted from April to November 2021 and involved radiologists, including attending radiologists, thoracic radiology fellows, and residents, who independently … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem is that most of the work on assessing the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for CXR indicates metrics obtained by developers on limited datasets in the so-called “laboratory conditions”. As can be seen from recent studies [ 12 , 15 ], the metrics obtained in this way look attractive for the subsequent implementation of such algorithms in clinical practice. Will AI for CXR analysis also work well and demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy metrics in real clinical practice?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem is that most of the work on assessing the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for CXR indicates metrics obtained by developers on limited datasets in the so-called “laboratory conditions”. As can be seen from recent studies [ 12 , 15 ], the metrics obtained in this way look attractive for the subsequent implementation of such algorithms in clinical practice. Will AI for CXR analysis also work well and demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy metrics in real clinical practice?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The diagnostic accuracy of the algorithms provided by the developers is quite high [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], reaching the same accuracy for radiologists [ 10 ], and for some solutions even exceeding them [ 11 , 12 ]. As of the beginning of 2023, 29 AI-based software products have European certification for medical use as a medical device (CE MDR/MDD), of which 11 have passed a similar certification in the United States [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI has a tremendous potential to revolutionize health care and make it more efficient by improving diagnostics, detecting medical errors, and reducing the burden of paperwork ( 3 , 4 ); however, chances are it will never replace physicians. Algorithms perform relatively well on knowledge-based tests despite the lack of domain-specific training; ChatGPT achieved ~ 66% and ~ 72% on Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support tests, respectively ( 5 ), and performed at or near the passing threshold on the United States Medical Licensing Exam ( 6 , 7 ).…”
Section: Can Chatgpt Replace Physicians?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For artificial-intelligence-based computer-aided detection (AI-CAD) tools, the primary aim is to enhance the detection performance of interpreting radiologists or physicians [ 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Therefore, in addition to intrinsic performance, the method of delivering the results of the analysis to physicians is the key component of an AI-CAD tool to demonstrate its efficacy and value in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%