1982
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(82)90003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of atomic oxygen and airglow excitation mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggestion was based on calculations of the efficiency of production of various states ofO 2 by Wraight (1982) and Smith (1984) that showed that the 5//g state is produced with about a 66~o efficiency. Bates (1988b) proposed that the fraction be reduced to 50~o to account for the smaller potential well depth of the 5I-Ig state, about 0.14 eV as computed by Partridge et aI.…”
Section: No Nightglowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggestion was based on calculations of the efficiency of production of various states ofO 2 by Wraight (1982) and Smith (1984) that showed that the 5//g state is produced with about a 66~o efficiency. Bates (1988b) proposed that the fraction be reduced to 50~o to account for the smaller potential well depth of the 5I-Ig state, about 0.14 eV as computed by Partridge et aI.…”
Section: No Nightglowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Krasnopol'sky's 1981 analysis preceded the calculations of Wraight (1982) and Smith (1984) and was based on a statistical distribution of states of 0 2 formed in the three-body recombination.…”
Section: No Nightglowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 At night, O 2 (b 1 ⌺ g ϩ ) is generated from oxygen atom three-body recombination, and potentially a large range of vibrational levels in the b 1 ⌺ g ϩ state is produced. [19][20][21] That emission from these vibrationally-excited O 2 (b 1 ⌺ g ϩ ) levels has, until recently, only been reported in aurora 10,11 and not in the nightglow suggests that removal of vibrationallyexcited levels is very rapid compared to vϭ0. This vibrational-level-dependent removal is well established for the vϭ1 level from laboratory investigations, where, for O 2 as collider, there is some six orders-of-magnitude difference in removal rate coefficient for vϭ0 ͑Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In view of the result of Ali et al [1986], and of calculations that also show that the expected O 2 ( a 1 Δ g ) yield from process is only several percent [ Bates , 1988; Wraight , 1982], the modeling community began considering process , as an additional source of atmospheric O 2 ( a 1 Δ g ) [ Howell et al , 1990; Kita et al , 1992; López‐González et al , 1992; McDade et al , 1987]. Several studies have indicated that, in addition to processes (1a) (2, 3), other sources of O 2 ( a 1 Δ g ) must be considered in order to explain the observed emission rates [ Howell et al , 1990; Kita et al , 1992; McDade et al , 1987].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical work has initially suggested that the weakly bound 5 Π g state is the principal precursor state [ Smith , 1984; Wraight , 1982]. However, Bates [1988] argues, on the basis of more recent theoretical curves for the relevant states, that the A 3 Σ u + , A ′ 3 Δ u , and c 1 Σ u − states taken together may also be important as precursors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%