2000
DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.19266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of bronchopulmonary sequestration with expression of the homeobox protein Hoxb-5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though no lung phenotype was reported in Hoxb5 mutant mice, Hoxb5 lung expression, in vitro studies, and expression data in human lung diseases suggest a role for Hoxb5 in lung development (6,43,52,53). The severity of the Hoxa5 lung phenotype indicates that Hoxa5 function is less subject to rescue by other genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though no lung phenotype was reported in Hoxb5 mutant mice, Hoxb5 lung expression, in vitro studies, and expression data in human lung diseases suggest a role for Hoxb5 in lung development (6,43,52,53). The severity of the Hoxa5 lung phenotype indicates that Hoxa5 function is less subject to rescue by other genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HoxB5 is a homeobox-containing gene that plays an important role in the patterning of airway branches 11,23,24. Strong expression of this gene is found in lung mesenchyme during branching morphogenesis, and its expression falls in the saccular stage11 and after birth it is expressed only in alveolar type I cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It occurs within a lobe of the lung, and unlike extralobar sequestrations, has no separate pleural investment. Unlike extralobar sequestrations which may be due to abnormal expression of homeobox genes, there is evidence that intralobar sequestrations are acquired lesions with a late presentation caused by recurrent bronchial obstruction and distal infection leading to scarring and fibrosis around the airway and ultimate isolation of the involved parenchyma [Volpe et al, 2000; Mendeloff, 2004].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%