2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of chest compression pause duration prior to E-CPR cannulation with cardiac arrest survival outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation toward clinical relevance is that wires were placed in the internal jugular vein and internal carotid artery before the initiation of CPR; this allowed for consistent cannulation times within groups (Table S5 ), which were desired to decrease confounding and minimize the variability of the pericannulation “no‐flow.” Our study protocol also used standardized, brief interruptions in chest compressions during cannulation (30‐second pause followed by 60 seconds of chest compressions) to minimize confounding variability. Although it is possible to keep chest compression fraction >80% during the past 5 minutes of CPR before ECPR cannulation, 53 there is more variation clinically in terms of chest compression mechanics and interruptions, 54 and this should be a future objective of clinical research. There was a lack of left ventricular unloading and the likely development of pulmonary congestion and edema, which could have been ameliorated clinically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation toward clinical relevance is that wires were placed in the internal jugular vein and internal carotid artery before the initiation of CPR; this allowed for consistent cannulation times within groups (Table S5 ), which were desired to decrease confounding and minimize the variability of the pericannulation “no‐flow.” Our study protocol also used standardized, brief interruptions in chest compressions during cannulation (30‐second pause followed by 60 seconds of chest compressions) to minimize confounding variability. Although it is possible to keep chest compression fraction >80% during the past 5 minutes of CPR before ECPR cannulation, 53 there is more variation clinically in terms of chest compression mechanics and interruptions, 54 and this should be a future objective of clinical research. There was a lack of left ventricular unloading and the likely development of pulmonary congestion and edema, which could have been ameliorated clinically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixth, ECMO complication data are not recorded in the GWTG-R database, limiting the details of our survival outcomes. Finally, given limitations of data availability, we could not incorporate CPR mechanics into our interpretation of outcomes (39, 40). Given these limitations introduced through the use of retrospective data, there continues to be a need for prospective studies of ECPR in this population; whether equipoise exists for randomized controlled trials of ECPR vs. CCPR should be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small number of patients had 20 minutes of hemodynamic data collection, which was still less than half the median arrest duration of 43 minutes. Thus, we did not have hemodynamics during ECPR cannulation for the majority of patients, and so we could not analyze the CCF at the time of cannulation and duration/frequency of pauses in resuscitation for cannulation, which has been associated with worse outcomes (11, 17). Additionally, technical details of cannulation (i.e., cannulation site, cannula sizes, and configuration) and surgeon skill were an unmeasured, but potentially important, factor for the outcomes of interest (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%