2024
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21030274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Endogenous Testosterone with Physical Fitness Measures during Firefighter Occupational Health Evaluations

Luiz Guilherme Grossi Porto,
Edgard M. K. V. K. Soares,
Sushant M. Ranadive
et al.

Abstract: Firefighting is a physically demanding profession associated with unacceptably high on-duty cardiovascular mortality. Low endogenous total testosterone (TT) is an emerging cardiometabolic (CM) risk factor in men, but limited data exists on its interactions with physical fitness (PF). Data from occupational health and fitness assessments of 301 male career firefighters (FFs) were analyzed. TT was categorized as low (<264 ng/dL), borderline (264–399 ng/dL), and reference (400–916 ng/dL). PF tests included car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to comparing those with and without current LBP for the entire sample, the same analyses were conducted for categories of age (< 45 yr, ≥ 45 yr) and obesity (BMI < 30 kg/m 2 -not obese, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 -obese), for which relationships with current LBP were anticipated. This approach was adapted from a recent cross-sectional study with firefighters examining a different independent variable [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to comparing those with and without current LBP for the entire sample, the same analyses were conducted for categories of age (< 45 yr, ≥ 45 yr) and obesity (BMI < 30 kg/m 2 -not obese, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 -obese), for which relationships with current LBP were anticipated. This approach was adapted from a recent cross-sectional study with firefighters examining a different independent variable [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%