1998
DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.18.1477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Fibrinogen, C-reactive Protein, Albumin, or Leukocyte Count With Coronary Heart Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

64
1,286
6
39

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,911 publications
(1,395 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(65 reference statements)
64
1,286
6
39
Order By: Relevance
“…Where the adjusted log risk ratio was not directly available from the study, it was estimated as 2.18/2.54 times the log risk ratio for the comparison of the top and bottom quartiles or 2.18/2.80 times the log risk ratio for the comparison of the top and bottom quintiles (Danesh et al, 1998). The standard error, s, of the log risk ratio b, was estimated from the approximation s 2 ¼ 2.18 (1/n 1 + 1/n 2 ), where n 1 is the number of individuals who had died from CHD and n 2 is the number who were still alive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where the adjusted log risk ratio was not directly available from the study, it was estimated as 2.18/2.54 times the log risk ratio for the comparison of the top and bottom quartiles or 2.18/2.80 times the log risk ratio for the comparison of the top and bottom quintiles (Danesh et al, 1998). The standard error, s, of the log risk ratio b, was estimated from the approximation s 2 ¼ 2.18 (1/n 1 + 1/n 2 ), where n 1 is the number of individuals who had died from CHD and n 2 is the number who were still alive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plays a critical role (22)(23)(24)(25). If this is so, it could explain the higher than expected rates of cardiovascular disease observed in patients with chronic systemic inflammatory diseases such as RA (26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We rescaled the reported relative risks to reflect a uniform scale (top versus bottom tertile), thereby enabling a direct comparison between the study estimates 39. A weakness of the present analysis is that we relied on published information when combining effect estimates from the different studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was CVD events (as defined above); secondary outcomes were CHD events and stroke events. Because studies reported effect estimates on different scales (eg, per standard deviation or across quartiles), we converted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to reflect a comparison of the top versus bottom tertiles of baseline osteoprotegerin distribution using methods described elsewhere 39. One study29 did not provide sufficient information on the osteoprotegerin distribution—a prerequisite for converting its risk ratio—and we therefore estimated its distribution on the basis of comparable study populations 26, 28, 30.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%