Association of image-defined risk factors with clinical features, tumor biology, and outcomes in neuroblastoma: a single-center retrospective study

Abstract

Background Image-defined risk factors (IDRF) in neuroblastoma have been developed to predict tumor resectability and surgical complications; however, the potential prognostic value of IDRF in neuroblastoma has been variably reported. Previous studies did not report the IDRF status separately from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) stage. Moreover, the association between IDRF and clinical and pathological factors has not been discussed further. Methods In this retrospective study, we investigated the clinical and biological features of neuroblastoma at different INRG stages based on IDRF. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) related to the INRG stage were analyzed using log-rank tests, and the prognostic value of the IDRF number and type was also evaluated. Results Among 72 patients, 182 IDRF at diagnosis were found in 79.2%. The distribution of the INRG stages was 10 L1 (13.9.0%), 25 L2 (34.7%), and 37 M/MS (51.4%). Patients with stage M/Ms had a larger tumor volume, a higher percentage of age ≥ 18 months, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, elevated ferritin level, and a higher percentage of COG high-risk compared with stage L1 and L2 patients. EFS and OS were similar for stage L1 and L2 tumors but were significantly poorer for metastatic disease. However, EFS (P = 0.06) and OS (P = 0.07) were similar for IDRF-negative and positive neuroblastomas. Patients with stage M/Ms with IDRF-positive had poorer EFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001) compared with patients in stage L2. An IDRF ≥ 4, vascular IDRF, and infiltrative IDRF of the tumor were significant indicators of poor prognosis. Conclusions Our study indicates that increasing the INRG stages based on IDRF is associated with various unfavorable clinical features of neuroblastoma. The principal determinant of survival in neuroblastoma is the presence of metastatic disease more than IDRF alone at diagnosis. Both the number and type of IDRF have important clinical significance in the protocol planning of neuroblastoma, rather than just considering the absence or presence of IDRF.