1991
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1991.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of INT2/HST1 coamplification in primary breast cancer with hormone-dependent phenotype and poor prognosis

Abstract: Summary The human proto-oncogene INT2 (homologous to the mouse INT2 gene, implicated in proviral induced mammary carcinoma) has been mapped to chromosome q 13 and found to share band localisation with, among others, the HSTJ proto-oncogene. Both genes are members of the fibroblast growth factor family. In the present study, coamplification (2-15 copies) of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
70
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 345 primary breast carcinomas, 50% showed moderate/strong immunohistochemical staining for cyclin D1 expression which was signi®cantly associated with oestrogen receptor positivity and an improved overall survival during observation for up to 20 years (Gillett et al, 1996). Our ®ndings are in agreement with these results, and should be compared to previous investigations demonstrating a negative in¯uence of cyclin D1 gene ampli®cation on disease outcome (Borg et al, 1991;Schuuring et al, 1992b;Henry et al, 1993) and that substantial clinical and experimental evidence points to cyclin D1 as an oncogene, both by in vitro transfection experiments (Jiang et al, 1993;Hinds et al, 1994;Lovec et al, 1994b;Zhou et al, 1995), in studies of transgenetic mice overexpressing cyclin D1 (Lovec et al, 1994a;Wang et al, 1994b) and in the ®ndings of a clonal rearrangement of the gene in mantel cell lymphomas (Withers et al, 1991) and parathyreoidea adenomas (Motokura et al, 1991). The prognostic discrepancy between cyclin D1 protein expression and gene ampli®cation analysis could be due to di erences in disease stages of patients in the various studies and the problem of de®ning a truly pathological cyclin D1 overexpression and not induced by mitogenes and steroids in receptor positive tumours .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Of 345 primary breast carcinomas, 50% showed moderate/strong immunohistochemical staining for cyclin D1 expression which was signi®cantly associated with oestrogen receptor positivity and an improved overall survival during observation for up to 20 years (Gillett et al, 1996). Our ®ndings are in agreement with these results, and should be compared to previous investigations demonstrating a negative in¯uence of cyclin D1 gene ampli®cation on disease outcome (Borg et al, 1991;Schuuring et al, 1992b;Henry et al, 1993) and that substantial clinical and experimental evidence points to cyclin D1 as an oncogene, both by in vitro transfection experiments (Jiang et al, 1993;Hinds et al, 1994;Lovec et al, 1994b;Zhou et al, 1995), in studies of transgenetic mice overexpressing cyclin D1 (Lovec et al, 1994a;Wang et al, 1994b) and in the ®ndings of a clonal rearrangement of the gene in mantel cell lymphomas (Withers et al, 1991) and parathyreoidea adenomas (Motokura et al, 1991). The prognostic discrepancy between cyclin D1 protein expression and gene ampli®cation analysis could be due to di erences in disease stages of patients in the various studies and the problem of de®ning a truly pathological cyclin D1 overexpression and not induced by mitogenes and steroids in receptor positive tumours .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These carcinoma have stressed that amplification and overexpression of Dl play an important cyclin Dl correlates with poor prognosis (Borg et al, 1991;Schuuring et al, 1992b;Muller et al, 1994). The present study y demonstrated overexshows that, in patients with invasive tumours, there was a lf of 75 urinary bladder tendency for patients with overexpression of cyclin Dl to have a lification of the 1 lq13 worse prognosis than patients with negatively stained tumours for icers (Schuuring, 1995; cyclin Dl, although the correlation between the overexpression of cyclin Dl and actuarial survival was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ErbB2 is overexpressed in a proportion of human tumours arising from several di erent sites (Berchuck et al, 1990;Hall et al, 1990;Kern et al, 1990;Yokota et al, 1986;Yonemura et al, 1991). In the breast, the 20 ± 25% of cancers which overexpress the gene have a poorer prognosis (Borg et al, 1990;Gasparini et al, 1992;Press et al, 1993;Slamon et al, 1987;Wright et al, 1989) and are relatively resistant to hormonal treatment (Wright et al, 1992) and chemotherapy (Gusterson et al, 1992;Muss et al, 1994). In vitro, ERBB2 is a transforming oncogene, both in rodent ®broblasts (Di Fiore et al, 1987) and immortalised breast epithelial cell lines (D'Souza et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 60% of breast cancers express oestrogen receptor (ER), and these tumours are less likely to overexpress ERBB2 (Adnane et al, 1989;Borg et al, 1990;Tandon et al, 1989). Tamoxifen is the leading hormonal treatment for breast cancer, producing objective disease responses in women with metastatic breast cancer (Hayward et al, 1977) and, in the adjuvant setting, increasing overall survival in post-menopausal women (Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group, 1992a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%