2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01012-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Labor Results and Staff Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study identified a set of shortcomings that cause difficulties in using existing methods for evaluating motivation. These disadvantages include [9][10][11][12] the lack of evaluation criteria for most indicators, difficulty in accurate calculation, and the lack of evaluation indicators for various management subsystems (personnel reserve, personnel development). The results of the study allowed us to structure the principles laid down in approaches to personnel management that are acceptable for food industry enterprises into four groups: expert assessment, comparison of costs and economic effects, benchmarking, and analysis of socio-economic factors of activity [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study identified a set of shortcomings that cause difficulties in using existing methods for evaluating motivation. These disadvantages include [9][10][11][12] the lack of evaluation criteria for most indicators, difficulty in accurate calculation, and the lack of evaluation indicators for various management subsystems (personnel reserve, personnel development). The results of the study allowed us to structure the principles laid down in approaches to personnel management that are acceptable for food industry enterprises into four groups: expert assessment, comparison of costs and economic effects, benchmarking, and analysis of socio-economic factors of activity [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%