2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gestational weight gain was categorized as above, within, or below Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations for twin pregnancies [22]. Underweight women not recommended by IOM were categorized based on recommendations from a large populationbased cohort study [23].…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gestational weight gain was categorized as above, within, or below Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations for twin pregnancies [22]. Underweight women not recommended by IOM were categorized based on recommendations from a large populationbased cohort study [23].…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recommended by another study [31], the exploration of optimal GWG was conducted within a low-risk subset that met the following criteria: (1) gestational age at birth between 37 and 42 weeks; (2) without any type of unfavorable gestational complications, such as HDP, LGA, SGA, and GDM; (3) without chronic hypertension and pre-pregnancy diabetes. The optimal GWG ranges for twin pregnancies by BMI category were calculated as the IQRs of total GWG or GWG rates in the low-risk subset.…”
Section: Optimal Gwg Ranges Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%