Background
Ankle fracture is common and the treatment is embarrassed. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been successfully adopted for the improvement of efficacy and quality. However, application of ERAS in ankle fracture patients especially at the early stage is variable and remains to be clarified. We intent to explore the effect of ERAS among ankle fracture patients.
Methods
There were 29 male and 51 female patients aged 41.71 ± 14. 51 years who were consecutively grouped into non-ERAS group (n = 40) and ERAS group (n = 40). Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were applied to assess the association in outcomes and variables.
Results
AOFAS at post-operative 3 month (PO3M) and post-operative 6 month (PO6M), costs, length of stay (LOS), and pre-operative LOS were verified significantly in univariate analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that ERAS can improve American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) at PO3M (β = 7.06, 95% CI, 4.45–9.65) and PO6M (β = 5.08, 95% CI, 2.35–7.80), reduce costs (β = -6885.13, 95% CI, -12089.40 - -1680.85) and LOS (β = -3.27, 95% CI, -4.97 - -1.57) among ankle fracture patients. With the numbers available, no significant differences were observed (p༞0.05) for the AOFAS at post-operative 12 month (PO12M) and post-operative 24 month (PO24M), complications, or opioids consumption.
Conclusion
We found ERAS is superior to general protocol among proper ankle fracture patients, which can enhance rehabilitation especially at the early stage and improve medical quality and efficiency by reducing costs and LOS. ERAS protocol may have a promising future and worth promoting.