2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Peripheral Membrane Proteins with Membranes: Free Energy of Binding of GRP1 PH Domain with Phosphatidylinositol Phosphate-Containing Model Bilayers

Abstract: Understanding the energetics of peripheral protein-membrane interactions is important to many areas of biophysical chemistry and cell biology. Estimating free-energy landscapes by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is challenging for such systems, especially when membrane recognition involves complex lipids, e.g., phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs). We combined coarse-grained MD simulations with umbrella sampling to quantify the binding of the well-explored GRP1 pleckstrin homology (PH) domain to model mem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
78
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculation of free energy profiles for lateral lipid interaction with these sites shows moderately tight binding of CL molecules compared to other regions on the protein, along with clear selectivity for CL over zwitterionic phospholipids, in agreement with indications from 31 P NMR measurements. 11 The well depths for these profiles are −20 to −25 kJ/mol and may be compared to profiles calculated via the same method for other protein–lipid interactions, including interactions of glycolipid and phosphoinositide with the EGFR, 14 binding of phosphoinositide to PH domains, 13 and in particular interactions of CL with mitochondrial C III and C IV . 22,52 This overall suggests the sites on bovine ANT1 have a clear affinity for CL, which is greater than that of the majority of CL binding sites on C IV , and is superseded by only two particularly high-affinity sites on C IV that exhibit interaction free energies of approximately −32 kJ/mol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Calculation of free energy profiles for lateral lipid interaction with these sites shows moderately tight binding of CL molecules compared to other regions on the protein, along with clear selectivity for CL over zwitterionic phospholipids, in agreement with indications from 31 P NMR measurements. 11 The well depths for these profiles are −20 to −25 kJ/mol and may be compared to profiles calculated via the same method for other protein–lipid interactions, including interactions of glycolipid and phosphoinositide with the EGFR, 14 binding of phosphoinositide to PH domains, 13 and in particular interactions of CL with mitochondrial C III and C IV . 22,52 This overall suggests the sites on bovine ANT1 have a clear affinity for CL, which is greater than that of the majority of CL binding sites on C IV , and is superseded by only two particularly high-affinity sites on C IV that exhibit interaction free energies of approximately −32 kJ/mol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we note the method has previously been shown to correctly predict lipid binding sites on an increasing number of other membrane proteins, 19,21,52 in agreement with experiment, 12 and is capable of predicting the effects of mutation on lipid binding. 13,14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…53 Biophysical and molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the PH domain and the polybasic region bind additional acidic lipids at non-canonical binding sites. 54,55 Whereas the activities and specificities of these 3 subfamilies differ broadly in solution, all are highly potent at activating both Arf1 and Arf6 in the presence of membranes, including EFA6 which is not active on Arf1 in solution. 29,46,49,[56][57][58] These stark differences highlight the importance to assess specificity using membranes and myristoylated Arf GTPases, as this is often the starting point for building models of the biology of the proteins being studied.…”
Section: Regulation Of Ph Domain-containing Arfgefs By Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at various resolutions have been used to investigate protein-lipid interactions in PH, [25][26][27][28] C2, [8] and GLA domains [29] and their results optimally complement experimental studies by providing a microscopic view of the lipid-protein interactions determining selectivity and affinity. [30] In the current study, we employ MD simulations to investigate the PIP 3 -specific membrane binding of GRP1-PHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%