Red flags have recently been raised concerning the growing burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in liver transplantation. Interestingly most large studies on NASH in liver transplantation have come from the US for at least two reasons. Firstly, there has been a more rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus, two major risk factors for non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) and NASH, in the US than in European and Asian countries. 1 The burden of NAFLD/NASH is currently higher in the US than in Europe, as the US has the highest number of obese adults in the world. With the success of direct-acting antivirals, the number of transplantations for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has drastically decreased and NASH is now the second most common indication for liver transplantation in the US. 2 Among those on the liver transplant waitlist due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), NASH-related HCC prevalence increased 11.8-fold from 2002 to 2016, the fastest growing cause of HCC. Second, US nationwide data concerning liver transplantation have been prospectively implemented by all transplant centres in the administrative Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry since 1988. The OPTN/UNOS dataset allowed for robust epidemiological studies, even if exhaustivity and accuracy of data have been a matter of concern. Standardised collection of data helped analyse trends in liver transplantation in the US. We have learned from the US registry that patients transplanted for NASH are older than patients transplanted for other indications. 3 Patients waitlisted for NASH have more comorbidities including impaired kidney function. 4 NASH is the most rapidly growing indication for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. 5 Post-transplant mortality due to cardiovascular diseases is higher in patients with NASH than other aetiologies. 6 Analysis of the OPTN/UNOS registry suggests that post-transplant survival in patients with NASH is not inferior to that in patients transplanted for other chronic liver diseases. 3,7 However, findings in the US may not be directly applicable to Europe. Until now, European data concerning NASH and transplantation have been scarce since no large administrative registry covering all European countries has been published.In this issue, Haldar and colleagues report the results of a large European registry, European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) aimed at analysing trends in liver transplantation for NASH throughout 174 transplant centres in 33 European countries. 8 In this study 2,741 patients with NASH (43% with NASH and 57% with presumed NASH) transplanted between 2002 and 2016 were included. The proportion of patients transplanted for NASH increased from 1.2% in 2002 to 8.4% in 2016. Among patients transplanted for NASH, 39.1% had HCC. Post-transplant survival was not significantly different in patients with and without NASH after adjusting for confounding factors. In patients with NASH and no HCC, adva...