2016
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/19356.8087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Risk Estimates of Three Different Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools with Carotid Intima Media Thickness in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cardiovascular risk scores can estimate the probability of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in patients with CKD regardless of renal function, albuminuria and previous cardiovascular events [ 57 ]. Herath et al in 2016 found that CVD risk assessment tools, both United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine and Framingham Risk Score have almost equal ability (former being marginally superior) in predicting underlying atherosclerotic vascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [ 58 ]. Nevertheless, in this study, we analysed a different population, who did not have a history of T2DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cardiovascular risk scores can estimate the probability of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in patients with CKD regardless of renal function, albuminuria and previous cardiovascular events [ 57 ]. Herath et al in 2016 found that CVD risk assessment tools, both United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine and Framingham Risk Score have almost equal ability (former being marginally superior) in predicting underlying atherosclerotic vascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [ 58 ]. Nevertheless, in this study, we analysed a different population, who did not have a history of T2DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrastingly, a study which evaluated three cardiovascular risk assessment tools, namely, the WHO/ISH risk score, Framingham risk score and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine has found that the WHO/ ISH risk score had a negative association (r=−0.07) with subclinical atherosclerosis when compared to the other two risk scores which had positive associations. 17 Therefore, more thorough research is required to confirm the regional risk prediction charts now in use for specific populations at the national and local levels. In spite of commendable preventive health programs on non-communicable diseases in India, the high prevalence of hypertension and diabetes (35.4% and 25.4%) found in our study when compared to national averages may be attributed to the expeditious urbanization process in urban and semi urban areas embracing lifestyle risk factors such as faulty dietary practices, alcohol, tobacco consumption, and physical inactivity.…”
Section: Multivariate Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this, there are discrepant results obtained from many studies, showing that the different CVD risk algorithms have variable precision in different populations when distinguishing subjects who are at high-risk from the other ones [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Moreover, a weak concordance between predicted and actual cardiovascular risk was also reported [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%