2022
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.853691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Social Determinants of Health With Rapid Response Events: A Retrospective Cohort Trial in a Large Pediatric Academic Hospital System

Abstract: BackgroundSocial determinants of health (SDH) are known to impact hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes. Little is known about the association between SDH and pediatric rapid response (RR) events and understanding this impact will help guide future interventions aimed to eliminate health disparities in the inpatient setting.ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study is to describe the association between SDH and RR utilization (number of RR events, time to RR event, shift of event and caller). The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notable potential confounders that were not collected that are associated with adverse outcomes include socioeconomic status, the primary language of the patient, the presence of a family member at the bedside, hospital staffing, hospital acuity at the time of the IHCA, and experience of the primary team. 12,[26][27][28][29][30] Additionally, there is significant variability in the composition and implementation of METs between hospitals that cannot be completely accounted for by hospital teaching status. 12 Moreover, the hospitals that participate in GWTG-R may have more robust MET evaluation systems in place than other hospitals, potentially limiting generalizability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable potential confounders that were not collected that are associated with adverse outcomes include socioeconomic status, the primary language of the patient, the presence of a family member at the bedside, hospital staffing, hospital acuity at the time of the IHCA, and experience of the primary team. 12,[26][27][28][29][30] Additionally, there is significant variability in the composition and implementation of METs between hospitals that cannot be completely accounted for by hospital teaching status. 12 Moreover, the hospitals that participate in GWTG-R may have more robust MET evaluation systems in place than other hospitals, potentially limiting generalizability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%