2020
DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of the Amount and Pattern of Physical Activity With Arterial Stiffness: The Maastricht Study

Abstract: We examined the associations of the amount and the pattern of higher intensity physical activity with arterial stiffness. Data from The Maastricht Study (n=1699; mean age: 60±8 years, 49.4% women, 26.9% type 2 diabetes (T2DM)) were used. Arterial stiffness was assessed by carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). The amount (hours/day) and pattern of higher intensity physical activity were assessed with the activPAL3®. Activity groups were: inactive (<75min/week), insufficiently active (75-150min/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most studies, participants were requested to wear the accelerometer for 7 d ( n = 40) (14,15,18,20,24–37,39–41,44–55,58–63,66) while they were awake ( n = 25) (15,18,20,24,25,28,29,31–34,36,37,41,44–46,49,55,59,60,66,67). Most researchers defined a week of measurement as “valid” if the accelerometer was worn for at least 4 d ( n = 25) (14,20,24–26,28,30,31,35–37,39,41,42,46,48,53,54,57,58,60,62,63,65,66) and for at least 10 h each day ( n = 41) (14,19,20,23–26,28–41,43–46,48–51,53,56,58–60,62–67). Most researchers also defined periods with 60 min of no signal or continuous zeros as “nonwear time,” but “interruptions” of up to 2 min in these periods of nonwear time were usually tolerated ( n = 13) (14,24,26,30,35,36,39,49,50,58,62,63,65).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In most studies, participants were requested to wear the accelerometer for 7 d ( n = 40) (14,15,18,20,24–37,39–41,44–55,58–63,66) while they were awake ( n = 25) (15,18,20,24,25,28,29,31–34,36,37,41,44–46,49,55,59,60,66,67). Most researchers defined a week of measurement as “valid” if the accelerometer was worn for at least 4 d ( n = 25) (14,20,24–26,28,30,31,35–37,39,41,42,46,48,53,54,57,58,60,62,63,65,66) and for at least 10 h each day ( n = 41) (14,19,20,23–26,28–41,43–46,48–51,53,56,58–60,62–67). Most researchers also defined periods with 60 min of no signal or continuous zeros as “nonwear time,” but “interruptions” of up to 2 min in these periods of nonwear time were usually tolerated ( n = 13) (14,24,26,30,35,36,39,49,50,58,62,63,65).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participant and publication characteristics. Participant and publication characteristics of the 52 included studies are described in Supplemental (15,(18)(19)(20). Studies were from 10 countries (Belgium (n = 1) [61], Brazil (n = 3) [27,29,57], Canada (n = 2) [14,62], Finland (n = 3) [17,43,55], Hong Kong (n = 1) [40], Japan (n = 4) [20,28,41,59], the Netherlands (n = 3) [19,38,56], Sweden (n = 2) [24,25], United Kingdom (n = 9) [32][33][34]42,44,45,47,51,52], and United States of America (n = 24) [15,16,18,23,26,30,31,[35][36][37]39,46,[48][49][50]53,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations