2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of the N100 TMS-evoked potential with attentional processes: A motor cortex TMS–EEG study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest mean N100 amplitude during hot spot stimulation was recorded at electrode C5 (see Supplementary Table A.1). This topographical maximum is in line with previous findings that report widely distributed N100 topographies posterior to C3 (Paus et al, 2001;Bonato et al, 2006;Bruckmann et al, 2012;Määttä et al, 2017;Kaarre et al, 2018). We, therefore, used C5 and defined the N100 peak as the most FIGURE 1 | (A) Model of the mapping grid with the corners of the grid named after cardinal points (North, East, South, West) (upper row) as well as a scheme of the stimulation coil (lower row) pictured with the approximate alignment in relation to the shape of the head (view is from the top of the head with the nose pointing upward).…”
Section: N100supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest mean N100 amplitude during hot spot stimulation was recorded at electrode C5 (see Supplementary Table A.1). This topographical maximum is in line with previous findings that report widely distributed N100 topographies posterior to C3 (Paus et al, 2001;Bonato et al, 2006;Bruckmann et al, 2012;Määttä et al, 2017;Kaarre et al, 2018). We, therefore, used C5 and defined the N100 peak as the most FIGURE 1 | (A) Model of the mapping grid with the corners of the grid named after cardinal points (North, East, South, West) (upper row) as well as a scheme of the stimulation coil (lower row) pictured with the approximate alignment in relation to the shape of the head (view is from the top of the head with the nose pointing upward).…”
Section: N100supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Instead, we observed a stable ipsilateral, posterior topographic maximum with small, statistically insignificant topography changes in the expected directions in the group grand average. This result is consistent with earlier findings on ipsilateral topographies (Bender et al, 2005;Bonato et al, 2006;Jarczok et al, 2016), but the existing literature is inconsistent regarding the exact relationship between N100 topography and coil placement: Although some studies report N100 topographies slightly anterior to our topography at C3 (e.g., Ferreri et al, 2011) or medial central near the vertex (Du et al, 2017;Spieser et al, 2010), more widely distributed N100 topographies during primary motor cortex stimulation have also been described, often in centroparietal and parieto-occipital regions, posterior and lateral to C3 (for the left hemisphere) (Paus et al, 2001;Bonato et al, 2006;Bruckmann et al, 2012;Määttä et al, 2017;Kaarre et al, 2018). These latter results are consistent with the topography reported in our experiment.…”
Section: N100 Topography Amplitude and Latencymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Again, our review observes that some of the TBS modulatory effect may not lead to significant behavioral moderation, and such changes may only be captured through other non-behavioral complementary techniques, such as EEG, PET, and fMRI. Previous TMS studies have demonstrated that it is possible to use imaging and signal detection techniques alongside behavioral tasks, such as n -back (Ko et al, 2008 ; Hautzel et al, 2009 ; Ott et al, 2011 ; Hoy et al, 2015 ; Kaarre et al, 2018 ). The use of multimodal techniques augments the results and makes it possible to have a vivid understanding of the behavioral and physiological impact of TBS on a specific brain region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a recent TMS-EEG study in healthy adults, poorer performance in the attention task was related to larger N100 amplitudes, indicating more pronounced GABA B ergic inhibition. This was hypothesized to result from a more excitable cortex that needs more inhibition to maintain its balance (Kaarre et al, 2018). Neuroplasticity is heightened during periods of brain development (Ismail, Fatemi, & Johnston, 2017), and developmental changes in both glutamatergic and GABAergic mechanisms are thought to underlie the experience-dependent plasticity of cortical circuits (Murphy, Beston, Boley, & Jones, 2005).…”
Section: Waveformmentioning
confidence: 99%