Association of the Type of Toy Used During Play With the Quantity and Quality of Parent-Infant Communication

Abstract

The early language environment of a child influences language outcome, which in turn affects reading and academic success. It is unknown which types of everyday activities promote the best language environment for children. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the type of toy used during play is associated with the parent-infant communicative interaction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Controlled experiment in a natural environment of parent-infant communication during play with 3 different toy sets. Participant recruitment and data collection were conducted between February 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014. The volunteer sample included 26 parent-infant (aged 10-16 months) dyads. EXPOSURES Fifteen-minute in-home parent-infant play sessions with electronic toys, traditional toys, and books. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Numbers of adult words, child vocalizations, conversational turns, parent verbal responses to child utterances, and words produced by parents in 3 different semantic categories (content-specific words) per minute during play sessions. RESULTS Among the 26 parent-infant dyads, toy type was associated with all outcome measures. During play with electronic toys, there were fewer adult words (mean, 39.62; 95% CI, 33.36-45.65), fewer conversational turns (mean, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.19), fewer parental responses (mean, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.87-1.77), and fewer productions of content-specific words (mean, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.49-2.35) than during play with traditional toys or books. Children vocalized less during play with electronic toys (mean per minute, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.16-3.69) than during play with books (mean per minute, 3.91; 95% CI, 3.09-4.68). Parents produced fewer words during play with traditional toys (mean per minute, 55.56; 95% CI, 46.49-64.17) than during play with books (mean per minute, 66.89; 95% CI, 59.93-74.19) and use of content-specific words was lower during play with traditional toys (mean per minute, 4.09; 95% CI, 3.26-4.99) than during play with books (mean per minute, 6.96; 95% CI, 6.07-7.97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Play with electronic toys is associated with decreased quantity and quality of language input compared with play with books or traditional toys. To promote early language development, play with electronic toys should be discouraged. Traditional toys may be a valuable alternative for parent-infant play time if book reading is not a preferred activity.

Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss

“…This would also allow for the measurement of the number of conversational turns between the DLP wearer and other adults and the amount of speech produced by the DLP wearer and other adults in a conversation, which would help to assess relative social participation. These variables have provided important insights into children’s patterns of verbal behavior in natural settings (e.g., VanDam et al, 2012; Thiemann-Bourque et al, 2014; Gilkerson et al, 2015; Sosa, 2016). Optimizing the LENA algorithms for use with adult DLP wearers could provide researchers and clinicians with a better understanding of the auditory environments and communication patterns of adults, as well as the real-world effects of intervention on the lives of adults.…”

“…More importantly, the LENA system provides access to detailed second-by-second data of sound levels and auditory environment classification, which allows for in-depth data mining. LENA was designed for and has been used extensively to study the language-learning environments of children (e.g., VanDam et al, 2012; Thiemann-Bourque et al, 2014; Gilkerson et al, 2015; Sosa, 2016), but it has also been used with adults (Li et al, 2014). Specifically, Li et al asked 37 older adults (aged 64–91 yr) residing in a retirement community to wear a LENA DLP for one day.…”

What Do Caregivers Tell Us about Infant Babbling?

“…Early language experience is critical to infant and child development (Sosa, 2015). It can form foundations for later success throughout all aspects of life including academic, employment, social, and psychological wellbeing.…”

Learning from Apps and Objects: The Human Touch

“…Families frequently read or watch television together, but less often co-use tablets and smartphones (Connell, Lauricella, & Wartella, 2015). When they do, interactions can suffer; parents and children talk less overall or use less varied speech (i.e., unique words) while playing with electronic toys versus traditional toys and books (Sosa, 2016;Zosh et al, 2015). Conversation during e-book reading often focuses more on the device than the story, hurting children's story comprehension (Chiong, Ree, Takeuchi, & Erickson, 2012;Krcmar & Cingel, 2014; Parish-Morris, Mahajan, Hirsh-Pasek, Golinkoff, & Collins, 2013).…”