2016
DOI: 10.5455/umj.20160424111257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of the Zwolle Score with Fragmented QRS Complex: A Combined Prognostic Tool for Primary Angioplasty in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarctions

Abstract: Introduction: We aimed to introduce the prognostic value of simultaneously calculated fragmented QRS and Zwolle scores as a new scoring system in primary PCI of the STEMI patients. Method: Two hundred fifty-nine STEMI patients were classified as fragmented QRS complex group (fQRS) and non-fragmented QRS complex group (non-fQRS) according to the fragmentation of QRS complex in electrocardiography. These two groups according to whether Zwolle score ≥3 were also classified as high Zwolle score with fQRS complex, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the remaining 12 studies that were reviewed in full text, three studies were not included because their endpoints were commingled with atrioventricular heart‐block or polymorphic ventricular extrasystoles, while another 2 were excluded because VTAs were not their observation endpoints. Unlike other studies investigating VTAs during AMI, the study by Lorgis et al investigated VTAs during long‐term follow‐up (846 ± 297 days) and was excluded for protecting our results against bias. Eventually, there were six cohort studies meeting the predefined eligibility criteria for the further analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the remaining 12 studies that were reviewed in full text, three studies were not included because their endpoints were commingled with atrioventricular heart‐block or polymorphic ventricular extrasystoles, while another 2 were excluded because VTAs were not their observation endpoints. Unlike other studies investigating VTAs during AMI, the study by Lorgis et al investigated VTAs during long‐term follow‐up (846 ± 297 days) and was excluded for protecting our results against bias. Eventually, there were six cohort studies meeting the predefined eligibility criteria for the further analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other studies investigating VTAs during AMI, the study by Lorgis et al investigated VTAs during long‐term follow‐up (846 ± 297 days) and was excluded for protecting our results against bias. Eventually, there were six cohort studies meeting the predefined eligibility criteria for the further analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations