2012
DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2012.734922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 and Ki67 in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that a high Ki-67 value (>14%) independently predicted a poor prognosis. 13 Therefore, oncologists at Ehime University Hospital use 14% as the cutoff point for Ki-67 expression to divide ER-positive breast cancers into low-and high-proliferation groups. Fourth, the T1 and T2 relaxation times and PD acquired using synthetic MRI were not compared to those evaluated using more traditional methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported that a high Ki-67 value (>14%) independently predicted a poor prognosis. 13 Therefore, oncologists at Ehime University Hospital use 14% as the cutoff point for Ki-67 expression to divide ER-positive breast cancers into low-and high-proliferation groups. Fourth, the T1 and T2 relaxation times and PD acquired using synthetic MRI were not compared to those evaluated using more traditional methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the Ki-67 labelling index is known to be a valuable prognostic marker in breast cancer and can distinguish between luminal A (lower Ki-67 levels; <14%) and B (higher Ki-67 levels; !14%) subtypes. 13 Moreover, the Ki-67 index reflects the extent of proliferative activity, an indicator of tumour aggressiveness. 14 Therefore, an accurate evaluation of Ki-67 status is important for the prognostic analysis of breast cancer; however, the accuracy of traditional invasive detection methods, namely biopsies, is influenced by sampling errors as biopsies may often not be sufficient in assessing intratumoural heterogeneity expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 Many previous studies have already demonstrated that Ki-67 expression is the strongest individual factor associated with poor differentiation of tumors and tumor size in BC. 41,42 Numerous studies have also shown that high Ki-67 expression has a negative relationship with ER expression. 42 One study showed an inverse correlation between expression of the hormone receptors, ER and PR, and Ki-67.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear protein Ki‐67 expression increases during cell proliferation and the percentage of cells positive for Ki‐67, termed the Ki‐67 labeling index (LI), has been shown to be a prognostic factor in many cancers, including breast cancer . Ki‐67 is a useful marker of proliferation because it is weakly expressed in G 0 but more strongly expressed in proliferating cells .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that the percentage of Ki‐67‐positive cells detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of breast cancer tissue correlates with patient outcomes. For example, Ki‐67 LI has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with pathological T1N0 disease who did not receive postoperative chemotherapy; in menopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive/ HER2 ‐negative breast cancer who received tamoxifen therapy without postoperative chemotherapy; and in patients with ER‐positive/ HER2 ‐negative cancer, including those who received postoperative chemotherapy . These studies stratified patients based on a Ki‐67 LI higher or lower than a pre‐specified cutoff value; the outcomes were generally better in patients with a lower LI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%