“…While quantitative binding assays only identify physical interactions and are mainly used for diagnostic purposes, functional neutralizing activity can only be directly investigated by means of VNTs platforms, that are grossly divided into direct VNTs, which require viable virions of SARS-CoV-2 and are considered the gold standard, and surrogate (s)VNTs, based on binding competition assays between antibodies and target receptors that mediate viral attachment and entry. Studies available so far have shown a significant degree of correlation between anti-S-RBD Abs levels and serum neutralizing bioactivity as assessed by VNTs [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , nonetheless some other studies have remarked that this correlation might change over time due to affinity maturation of humoral response, thus limiting the absolute quantitative value of anti-S-RBD Abs as a reliable COP [15] , [16] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] . In fact, waning of binding Abs either after natural infection or vaccination might be countered by the maintenance of neutralizing capacity by ongoing affinity maturation of Spike-specific B lymphocytes [27] .…”