2020
DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_269_19
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of vitamin D levels in coal miners: A case–control study

Abstract: Introduction: Coal miners working underground are likely to be at greater risk of developing Vitamin D deficiency due to reduced sunlight exposure. To date, only three studies have been reported, with no significant risk of Vitamin D deficiency among coal miners. None were conducted in the tropical region, where sunlight is ample. Objective: The present study estimated Vitamin D levels among underground coal miners in a tropical region and determined their associated fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can additionally explain the difference in VitD status with the urban-living Serbian general male population, not performing hard physical work, in which levels were almost three times lower (49.8 ± 17.2 nmol/L), despite quite similar BMI (28 ± 6.3 kg/m 2 ), waist circumference (98.5 ± 18 cm), and slightly higher FM% (24.8 ± 10.3%) ( 28 ). However, this cannot explain the difference in VitD status with other published data on summer VitD status in coal miners around the world ( 18 21 ). The main explanations for the difference with the Newcastle (UK) coal miners [where average values of 73.8 ± 73.4 nmol/L were found during the summer period ( 18 ), which were two times lower compared with these data] are geographic latitude and the lower level of insolation, apart from the earlier time of sampling (from May to July).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This can additionally explain the difference in VitD status with the urban-living Serbian general male population, not performing hard physical work, in which levels were almost three times lower (49.8 ± 17.2 nmol/L), despite quite similar BMI (28 ± 6.3 kg/m 2 ), waist circumference (98.5 ± 18 cm), and slightly higher FM% (24.8 ± 10.3%) ( 28 ). However, this cannot explain the difference in VitD status with other published data on summer VitD status in coal miners around the world ( 18 21 ). The main explanations for the difference with the Newcastle (UK) coal miners [where average values of 73.8 ± 73.4 nmol/L were found during the summer period ( 18 ), which were two times lower compared with these data] are geographic latitude and the lower level of insolation, apart from the earlier time of sampling (from May to July).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…This study is among the very rare ones that examined the levels of VitD in a population of underground coal miners. We found surprisingly high levels of late-summer serum 25 (OH) VitD, which were much higher compared with the same season VitD data on an urban-living, general male Serbian population from similar geographic latitude (28), and previously published values for coal miners from other geographic regions (18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the article titled “Association of Vitamin D Levels in Coal Miners: A Case–Control Study”, by Sanjay Dash, Sandhya Gupta, Venkatarao Epari, Priti Yugma Patra., 0.4103/ijcm.IJCM_269_19 published on pages 181-183, Issue 2, Volume 45 of Indian Journal of Community Medicine [ 1 ], there has been a technical typographical error, in the expression of levels of vitamin – D. It is mentioned as ng/dl, which on the contrary should have been ng/ml.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%