2015
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.8.3285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism with Colorectal Cancer Risk: A HuGE Meta Analysis of 35 Studies

Abstract: Background: Non-synonymous polymorphisms in XRCC1 hase been shown to reduce effectiveness of DNA repair and be associated with risk of certain cancers. In this study we aimed to clarify any association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk by performing a meta-analysis of published case-control studies. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to explore the association between XRCC1 and CRC. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XRCC1 gene is a DNA-repair gene that encodes a protein that plays a major role in single-strand break repair and base excision repair systems. A recent large-scale meta-analysis confirmed the presence of a significant link between XRCC1 399Arg/Gln polymorphism and the development of CRC [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The XRCC1 gene is a DNA-repair gene that encodes a protein that plays a major role in single-strand break repair and base excision repair systems. A recent large-scale meta-analysis confirmed the presence of a significant link between XRCC1 399Arg/Gln polymorphism and the development of CRC [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…studies in which distribution of genotype in controls deviated significantly from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium) were excluded, the increased risk association remained statistically significant based on data from 22 studies involving 6149 cases and 10 167 controls. To address this inconsistency, a more thorough HuGE meta‐analysis of 35 studies (involving 9114 cases and 13 948 controls) was performed with a more stringent inclusion criteria and the results obtained concurred with that an increased colorectal cancer risk was observed for the variant allele . Overall, the lack of significant risk association of the XRCC1 c.580C>T (p.Arg194Trp) and c.839G>A (p.Arg280His) polymorphisms makes them unsuitable to be used as a predisposition biomarker for colorectal cancer, whereas it is conceivable to suggest the potential use of the c.1196A>G (p.Gln399Arg) polymorphism as a predictive biomarker for colorectal cancer predisposition.…”
Section: Dna Repair Genesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To address this inconsistency, a more thorough HuGE meta-analysis of 35 studies (involving 9114 cases and 13 948 controls) was performed with a more stringent inclusion criteria and the results obtained concurred with that an increased colorectal cancer risk was observed for the variant allele. 77 Overall, the lack of significant risk association of the XRCC1 c.580C>T (p.Arg194Trp) and c.839G>A (p.…”
Section: Mutyhmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[7][8][9] Thus, various hypothesis-driven case-control studies have been carried out to evaluate the association between the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer and polymorphisms within candidate genes such as OGG1, APEX, POLB, XRCC1 and MUTYH (base excision repair [BER]), ERCC1, ERCC2, XPC and ERCC5 (nucleotide excision repair [NER]), XRCC2 and XRCC3 (double-strand breaks repair [DSB]) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). 9,10 Positive associations were described for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within APEX, ERCC1, MUTYH, OGG1, XPC, XPG, XRCC1 and XRCC3 genes, [11][12][13][14][15][16] but some results were either discordant or not replicated 9,11,[16][17][18][19] likely as the consequence of a limited statistical power. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) could not confirm most of the positive associations within the DNA repair genes previously described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%